Subject: [Fwd: Problem raith SNF 2005-08-11 17:48:50: ALERT for Users working in overlay]
From: James Conway <jwc@snf.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:38:32 -0700
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:38:32 -0700
I will be troubleshooting this issue this evening, returning to the 100 
um Write Field size I am accustomed to.
Has any one made an changes, or attempted to make any changes, to 
default parameters on the system while I was a way on vacation?

RSVP...

James Conway



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Problem raith SNF 2005-08-11 17:48:50: ALERT for Users working 
in overlay
Date: 	Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:48:51 -0700
From: 	jwc@snf.stanford.edu
To: 	raith-pcs@snf.stanford.edu



Three times now in the last tenb days, I have had problems picking up targets during
WF target acquisition for OVERLAY writes.  Measured offsets of these acquisition site
do not correspond with any normal offset postion values.
Users are requested to report to this list if they are experiencing similar problems.
James Conway 08112005:17:50:00.00



I will be troubleshooting this issue this evening, returning to the 100 um Write Field size I am accustomed to.
Has any one made an changes, or attempted to make any changes, to default parameters on the system while I was a way on vacation?

RSVP...

James Conway



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Problem raith SNF 2005-08-11 17:48:50: ALERT for Users working in overlay
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:48:51 -0700
From: jwc@snf.stanford.edu
To: raith-pcs@snf.stanford.edu


Three times now in the last tenb days, I have had problems picking up targets during WF target acquisition for OVERLAY writes.  Measured offsets of these acquisition site do not correspond with any normal offset postion values.
Users are requested to report to this list if they are experiencing similar problems.
James Conway 08112005:17:50:00.00