Hi all -- My sincere apologies to everyone... Between vacation and jury duty, we dropped the ball on communicating Coral name changes... Basically, gaas23 equals fga2, but we changed the name to better reflected the functionality of the system. So, any processing that is accepted previously as normal processing for gaas23 can be done on fga2. However, any non-standard processing (new materials - particularly anything containing volatiles, and new process parameters [such as higher temperatures for GaAs out of the normal range]) will require prior Staff/SpecMat approval (our concerns are ensuring safety and guarding against contamination, as more people are using the system.) John will be transferring over qualifications this afternoon, so you should be able to enable fga2 soon. Again, my apologies... Mary Donghun Choi wrote: > So ..can we use it for GaAs ? > > Thanks > > donghun > Quoting John Shott <shott@stanford.edu>: > > >> Chion: >> >> Well ... I can tell you what I know ... >> >> I was told that gaas23 should be "renamed" fga2. Since we never >> actually remove a piece of equipment from the database including >> qualification records, usage records, etc, all of that is still there. >> But, you can't see it in the coral equipment tree because it was removed >> from the equipment tree and, more or less in its place is a piece of >> equipment that I was told should be fga2. If it was a case where I was >> supposed to move all qualifications from one name to another then that >> was my error .... >> >> Not to be passing the buck ... but I was acting on information that I >> thought had been provided by Mary Tang and/or Ed Myers. >> >> So we'll have to wait for them to see what the scoop is. If it should >> revert to gaas23 then that is simple and all of your qualifications will >> re-appear. >> >> Thanks, >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- Mary X. Tang, Ph.D. Stanford Nanofabrication Facility CIS Room 136, Mail Code 4070 Stanford, CA 94305 (650)723-9980 mtang@stanford.edu http://snf.stanford.edu