From emyers at snf.stanford.edu  Thu Oct  5 08:28:24 2006
From: emyers at snf.stanford.edu (emyers at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:28:24 -0700
Subject: Comment afm2 SNF 2006-10-05 08:28:23: 10/5 Update
Message-ID: <mailman.184.1356280963.3333.afm2-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

I am in contact with Veeco.  They are trying to assemble a software package for the tool.  Their records do not match the current configuration of our tool.  I received a quote for upgrading the computer system, but it is a 60-90 day delivery.



From emyers at snf.stanford.edu  Fri Oct 27 18:16:10 2006
From: emyers at snf.stanford.edu (emyers at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:16:10 -0700
Subject: Comment afm2 SNF 2006-10-05 08:28:23: 10/5 Update
Message-ID: <mailman.185.1356280963.3333.afm2-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>




From emyers at snf.stanford.edu  Fri Oct 27 18:16:38 2006
From: emyers at snf.stanford.edu (emyers at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:16:38 -0700
Subject: Shutdown afm2 SNF 2006-09-27 09:26:32: Network disabled/PC down
Message-ID: <mailman.186.1356280963.3333.afm2-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

New software and computer installed and collecting scans



From emyers at snf.stanford.edu  Fri Oct 27 18:17:38 2006
From: emyers at snf.stanford.edu (emyers at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:17:38 -0700
Subject: Comment afm2 SNF 2006-10-27 18:17:37: Caution
Message-ID: <mailman.187.1356280963.3333.afm2-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

Everything looks OK.  I have not tested the scanner calilbration