From eperalta at stanford.edu Wed Aug 4 17:19:28 2010 From: eperalta at stanford.edu (Edgar Peralta) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:19:28 -0700 Subject: reticle for 160-800nm pitch binary gratings? Message-ID: Dear ASML users, does anyone have a reticle for 160-800 nm pitch binary gratings over an area of at least 200x200um? I'd like to borrow it for some test runs before I decide to purchase my own. Let me know Edgar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eperalta at stanford.edu Thu Aug 5 08:31:08 2010 From: eperalta at stanford.edu (Edgar Peralta) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:31:08 -0700 Subject: Anyone have a reticle for 160-800nm pitch binary gratings? Message-ID: Dear ASML users, Does anyone have reticle for binary gratings (50% duty cycle) with periods anywhere between 160 and 800nm? If so, please let me know, I'd like to borrow it for a preliminary run. Edgar On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Edgar Peralta wrote: > Dear ASML users, > > does anyone have a reticle for 160-800 nm pitch binary gratings over an > area of at least 200x200um? > > I'd like to borrow it for some test runs before I decide to purchase my > own. > > Let me know > > Edgar > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wonux at stanford.edu Thu Aug 5 20:17:06 2010 From: wonux at stanford.edu (Wonuk Jo) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 20:17:06 -0700 Subject: Released from 9:00pm to 11:00pm Message-ID: <2B777540-E973-491A-9DED-651CE321432C@stanford.edu> Wafers are not ready to process. sorry for the last minute notice. -Josh Wonuk Jo Graduate Student Electrical Engineering Stanford University 919.279.0638 -We live by faith, not by sight -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mahnaz at stanford.edu Fri Aug 6 11:42:26 2010 From: mahnaz at stanford.edu (Mahnaz Mansourpour) Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:42:26 -0700 Subject: Particle warning Message-ID: <4C5C5792.4030403@stanford.edu> Hello all, The last few days every day we have found particle on the chuck. Gary send out a note yesterday and Linda tells me this morning that there is a good size particle on the chuck. I hate to take any names off the tool but if I have to take that action, I will. So make sure that back of the wafers ( all needs to be checked) are clean, if not clean them and run them through SRD. Please refer to the attachment I sent you before training and there is a copy of it in the asml binder next to the tool. Next check will be Monday mahnaz From wonux at stanford.edu Fri Aug 6 14:21:40 2010 From: wonux at stanford.edu (Wonuk Jo) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:21:40 -0700 Subject: released from 6:30pm to 7:30pm Message-ID: <88A03992-53A5-4ACA-B5F2-56FC3838E6F6@stanford.edu> wafers not ready. Wonuk Jo Graduate Student Electrical Engineering Stanford University 919.279.0638 -We live by faith, not by sight -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mahnaz at stanford.edu Wed Aug 11 09:55:12 2010 From: mahnaz at stanford.edu (Mahnaz Mansourpour) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:55:12 -0700 Subject: Particle on the chuck Message-ID: <4C62D5F0.9050300@stanford.edu> Hello all, we had another one this morning....ASML is totally unhappy about it so do I. Starting today I will take your privilege away if the particles n the chuck comes out positive , I will do check the list of users daily, meaning from the time Linda does the test to the next day when the test gets repeated. The punishment will be: Two weeks loss of access to the tool and community services. mahnaz From ludwig.galambos at gmail.com Thu Aug 12 11:44:51 2010 From: ludwig.galambos at gmail.com (Ludwig G.) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:44:51 -0700 Subject: release 3pm reservation Message-ID: I was able to do it in the AM hours Thanks Linda -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eperalta at stanford.edu Fri Aug 13 16:36:15 2010 From: eperalta at stanford.edu (Edgar Peralta) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:36:15 -0700 Subject: 4:30pm reservation removed (eom) Message-ID: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtang at stanford.edu Fri Aug 13 18:20:21 2010 From: mtang at stanford.edu (Mary Tang) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:20:21 -0700 Subject: Missing Shared Mask Message-ID: <4C65EF55.4050801@stanford.edu> Dear ASML users -- A shared mask used by several labmembers has gone missing. It has several arrays of patterned dots, in positive and negative tone. The mask box is likely labeled "ParticleMask100nm" or something like that. The mask box will also have my name on it. Please keep an eye out for it. If you happen to see this, please let a staff member or Alvin know (who is hoping to use the mask as soon as possible). Thanks, Mary -- Mary X. Tang, Ph.D. Stanford Nanofabrication Facility CIS Room 136, Mail Code 4070 Stanford, CA 94305 (650)723-9980 mtang at stanford.edu http://snf.stanford.edu From eperalta at stanford.edu Wed Aug 18 15:24:16 2010 From: eperalta at stanford.edu (Edgar Peralta) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:24:16 -0700 Subject: 3-4pm reservation removed (eom) Message-ID: Sorry for the late notice...meeting ran longer than expected. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From josep at stanford.edu Fri Aug 20 16:00:34 2010 From: josep at stanford.edu (Jose Ivan Padovani) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Friday 5:30pm to 6:30pm released Message-ID: <1497236421.538527.1282345234222.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> Wafers will not be ready. Sorry for the late notice. -- Jose I. Padovani MS/PhD Student Electrical Engineering Department Stanford University