bmurray at snf.stanford.edu
Tue Apr 9 16:48:52 PDT 2002
John and Mike,
I think Jason has discouraged us from using the print queue on CIS. (Don't
quote me on this cause my memory is a little fuzzy on this one.) At one
time we had access to cis, but this has changed since Jason upgraded the
box. I think there are real advantages to having a Unix box control the
print queues for all our printers. However, to accomplish this we will
probably need to move the print queues to one of our Unix boxes (like
snf). Once again, I don't know when we'll find the time to do this.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Mike Bell wrote:
> Actually I started using jet direct after Jason advised it. I wasn't aware of any
> problems, but that doesn't mean they don't exit. If printing through the
> cis.stanford.edu machine works that sounds good to me. I can't say that I've
> ever noticed the offline problem you mentioned, but I'll be glad to check it out.
> I have to plead guilty to setting up Dick's machine to use it.
> John Shott wrote:
> > Mike:
> > Related to printing ... rather than each person using Jetdirect and the
> > possiblity that they can screw things up, I had thought that it was better if
> > folks printed to the barlett print queue on cis.stanford.edu. I had thought
> > that people had too much control over the printer if they were running
> > Jetdirect. Am I confused on this score?
> > I'm sort of thinking about this, becuase I keep finding that bartlett is
> > offline after Dick Crane prints and it appears as if he is not going through
> > the cis print queue. While I may have misinterpreted these symptons, that is
> > what I thought I had observered.
> > Thanks,
> > John
More information about the computer