From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Thu May 1 08:09:26 2003 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 08:09:26 -0700 Subject: RAITH mail list addition and request... Message-ID: <3EB138A6.35F9488B@snf.stanford.edu> Hello John: 1. Please add David Goldhaber-Gordon to the raith at snf.stanford.edu mail list. 2. Please verify that these persons CC'd above are on this list as well, as they should have been subscribed when they were qualified last year but indicated to me that they may not be receiving all email notices. 3. In the mailing list email archives from the web site can we please add the RAITH list(s) to this page? For discussion list raith at snf.stanford.edu and raith-pcs at snf.stanford.edu. Thank you for your assistance! James Conway From hopcroft at snf.stanford.edu Thu May 1 09:25:36 2003 From: hopcroft at snf.stanford.edu (Matt Hopcroft) Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: connecting to bartlett printer? Message-ID: Hello, I'd like to use the SNF printer called bartlett (the one by the SNF main door). What do I need to know? Thanks, -Matt -Matt Hopcroft hopcroft at snf.stanford.edu From bmurray at snf.stanford.edu Thu May 1 11:42:00 2003 From: bmurray at snf.stanford.edu (Bill Murray) Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 11:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: connecting to bartlett printer? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Matt, You can find detailed step-by-step instructions on connecting to bartlett at http://cis-net.stanford.edu/SU/print/ In addition to these instructions, you will also need the appropriate driver for the new bartlett printer. You can download the driver from http://snf.stanford.edu/printers/ Welcome back, Bill On Thu, 1 May 2003, Matt Hopcroft wrote: > > Hello, > I'd like to use the SNF printer called bartlett (the one by the > SNF main door). What do I need to know? Thanks, -Matt > > -Matt Hopcroft > hopcroft at snf.stanford.edu > From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Fri May 2 16:14:22 2003 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:14:22 -0700 Subject: Subscribe request for David Goldhaber Gordon Message-ID: <3EB2FBCE.AE57E485@snf.stanford.edu> Hello: Could you please subscribe this person to raith-pcs at snf.stanford.edu David Goldhaber-Gordon goldhaber-gordon at stanford.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From goldhaber-gordon at stanford.edu Sun May 4 23:35:11 2003 From: goldhaber-gordon at stanford.edu (David Goldhaber-Gordon) Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 23:35:11 -0700 Subject: RAITH mail list addition and request... In-Reply-To: <3EB138A6.35F9488B@snf.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <002201c312d0$7b27f6a0$46d642ab@stanford.edu> Dear John, I learned this weekend from one of my group members that the Raith went down again. I am very eager to be included on the raith at snf.stanford.edu email list so that I get more timely updates. I'd appreciate it if you could put me on the list as soon as possible. Please also check that the two students copied on this note (Charis Quay and Linday Moore) are on the list, and if they are not, please add them. I look forward to hearing from you when you are able to set this up. Best wishes, David ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- David Goldhaber-Gordon goldhaber-gordon at stanford.edu Assistant Professor of Physics davidg at post.harvard.edu Stanford University (permanent forwarding) www.goldhaber-gordon.com (650) 725-2047 (lab) (650) 724-3709 (office) Address for letters or packages: Administrative Associate: David Goldhaber-Gordon Roberta Edwards Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials McCullough, Rm. 338 McCullough Building, Room 346 Phone: (650) 723-8028 476 Lomita Mall Fax: (650) 724-3681 Stanford, CA 94305-4045 email: redward at stanford.edu -----Original Message----- From: James Conway [mailto:jwc at snf.stanford.edu] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 8:09 AM To: John Shott; computer at snf.stanford.edu Cc: David Goldhaber-Gordon; Charis Quay; LINDSAY Moore; Mark Allen Topinka Subject: RAITH mail list addition and request... Importance: High Hello John: 1. Please add David Goldhaber-Gordon to the raith at snf.stanford.edu mail list. 2. Please verify that these persons CC'd above are on this list as well, as they should have been subscribed when they were qualified last year but indicated to me that they may not be receiving all email notices. 3. In the mailing list email archives from the web site can we please add the RAITH list(s) to this page? For discussion list raith at snf.stanford.edu and raith-pcs at snf.stanford.edu. Thank you for your assistance! James Conway From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Wed May 7 14:26:39 2003 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 14:26:39 -0700 Subject: You have been requalified on the RAITH, please reply to email to get your names on email discussion list. Message-ID: <3EB97A0F.AA6F2022@snf.stanford.edu> Greetings Lindsay, Charis, and Mark: You have been requalified on the RAITH, please reply to email to get your names on email discussion list. In Coral, I have requalified you as a user on the RAITH 150 system. Later today you should be receiving a email from the ezmlm program which is managing the raith at snf.stanford.edu mailing list. PLEASE REPLY TO THAT MESSAGE TO START YOUR EMAIL. This should get you up and coming. James Conway From booth at snf.stanford.edu Mon May 12 09:47:41 2003 From: booth at snf.stanford.edu (Len Booth) Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 09:47:41 -0700 Subject: Cesars e-mail Message-ID: <3EBFD02D.BD176FF6@snf.stanford.edu> Gentlemen - Cesar asked me to report that his e-mail is down, and he cannot receive or send any messages. He said his e-mail has been flaky for a while, but has been totally unusable since last Thursday. Len From shott at snf.stanford.edu Mon May 12 15:40:22 2003 From: shott at snf.stanford.edu (John Shott) Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 15:40:22 -0700 Subject: Cesars e-mail References: <3EBFD02D.BD176FF6@snf.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <3EC022D6.25BB6B22@snf.stanford.edu> Len: I presume that Cesar means e-mail on his PC? Here is what I suggest: 1. He should first check the fragmentation on his disk and defragment if need be. 2. He should reboot his PC. Then, he should re-check to see if there is a problem with his e-mail locally. I've checked the mail server and don't find anything suspicious there ... Thanks, John From bmurray at snf.stanford.edu Mon May 12 17:41:36 2003 From: bmurray at snf.stanford.edu (Bill Murray) Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 17:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Cesars e-mail In-Reply-To: <3EBFD02D.BD176FF6@snf.stanford.edu> Message-ID: Len, It was a bad network patch cable. It's been replaced. Bill On Mon, 12 May 2003, Len Booth wrote: > Gentlemen - > Cesar asked me to report that his e-mail > is down, and he cannot receive or send any messages. > He said his e-mail has been flaky for a while, but > has been totally unusable since last Thursday. > Len > From tberg at snf.stanford.edu Wed May 14 06:33:07 2003 From: tberg at snf.stanford.edu (Ted Berg) Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 06:33:07 -0700 Subject: Comments on Coral Message-ID: <3EC24593.A49FAC71@snf.stanford.edu> To all, I sent a comment/request a few months ago requesting that comments be included in themaintenance section of coral . Issues are not always resolved immediately and comments offer a blow by blow running account of what happens along the way to resolution. I am sure they are allin the data base would it be thaty much of a problem to bing up a check box to include comments in the search box??ted From rcrane at snf.stanford.edu Wed May 14 07:55:12 2003 From: rcrane at snf.stanford.edu (Dick Crane) Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 07:55:12 -0700 Subject: Comments on Coral References: <3EC24593.A49FAC71@snf.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <3EC258D0.5E57180C@snf.stanford.edu> Ted, This is an excellent idea as it allows for an update commentary without taking a "problem" hit which is not appropriate. John, can we get this item place in your job jar or should it go into MIT's jar? Thanks, Dick Ted Berg wrote: > To all, > I sent a comment/request a few months ago requesting that comments > be included in themaintenance section of coral . Issues are not always > resolved immediately and comments offer a blow by blow running account > of what happens along the way to resolution. I am sure they are allin > the data base would it be thaty much of a problem to bing up a check box > to include comments in the search box??ted From tberg at snf.stanford.edu Fri May 30 06:53:41 2003 From: tberg at snf.stanford.edu (Ted Berg) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 06:53:41 -0700 Subject: Can't see computers near me Message-ID: <3ED76264.B5C5AD5E@snf.stanford.edu> I had to reboot yesterday netscape was dreadfully slow . now i can't see computers near me to get to printers. thanks for help.ted From shott at snf.stanford.edu Fri May 30 08:28:13 2003 From: shott at snf.stanford.edu (John Shott) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:28:13 -0700 Subject: Can't see computers near me References: <3ED76264.B5C5AD5E@snf.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <3ED7788D.4D5006A1@snf.stanford.edu> Ted: I need a little more information ... what is your machine's name? Which machines can't you see? Is this when you look at "Network Neighborhood" on your PC? Or are you looking somewhere else? Thanks, John From michael.bell at stanford.edu Fri May 30 09:32:30 2003 From: michael.bell at stanford.edu (Michael Bell) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 09:32:30 -0700 Subject: Can't see computers near me In-Reply-To: <3ED7788D.4D5006A1@snf.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <002101c326c9$10cbf5b0$ab00a8c0@reef> John and Ted, The microsoft browser stuff is kind of odd. Keep in mind it is essentially the attempt to keep server kind of network information (where different machines are, who's in what workgroup etc.) in an environment without a server. And also to do this without adding tons of traffic to the network. This means that browser information may live on any machine in the group and gets updated irregularly. So imagine someone who's machine is acting as the master browser turns it off - now for some period of time until a new master browser is promoted, you may loose network information. Also when you add a machine to the network it may take quite a while until it shows up in the "neighborhood". My guess is that this gets better in later versions of the OS. Here's a link that talks about it on windows 2000. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodt echnol/windows2000serv/reskit/tcpip/part4/tcpappi.asp Mike -----Original Message----- From: John Shott [mailto:shott at snf.stanford.edu] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:28 AM To: Ted Berg Cc: computer at snf.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Can't see computers near me Ted: I need a little more information ... what is your machine's name? Which machines can't you see? Is this when you look at "Network Neighborhood" on your PC? Or are you looking somewhere else? Thanks, John