From bmurray at snf.stanford.edu Wed Feb 1 16:01:58 2006 From: bmurray at snf.stanford.edu (Bill Murray) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:01:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: Test Message-ID: From member at ebay.com Mon Feb 6 04:04:56 2006 From: member at ebay.com (member at ebay.com) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:04:56 -0500 Subject: Message from eBay Member Message-ID: <200602061204.k16C4uYg025940@buftest01.sln.suny.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nanotech at nsti.org Mon Feb 6 10:19:14 2006 From: nanotech at nsti.org (NSTI Nanotech Ventures) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:19:14 -0800 Subject: NSTI Nanotech Ventures 2006 - Call for Participation Message-ID: NSTI Nanotech Ventures 2006 May 7 ? 11, 2006 Hynes Convention Center Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. http://www.nsti.org/Nanotech2006/Development/ventures.html About NSTI Nanotech Ventures An ideal forum for ?seed? to ?early-stage? companies to showcase their technologies, market advantages, and to search for funding. Selected companies give 15 minute presentations, and benefit from on-site networking with the NSTI Nanotech Ventures Vetting Team, corporate capital, venture capital and multi-sector investment attendees. Join the Nanotech Ventures community in participating in the world?s largest nanotechnology venture forum. Important Dates Conference: May 7-11, 2006, Boston MA, USA Submission date: March 3rd, 2006 Notification date: March 17th, 2006 How To Participate: Submit an executive summary of your company for review by the NSTI-NIR team: http://www.nsti.org/Nanotech2006/Development/ventures.html --- You are currently subscribed to nanotech as: coral at snf.stanford.edu To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nanotech-6748833M at spirit.sparklist.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paypal at email.paypal.com Sat Feb 11 13:23:00 2006 From: paypal at email.paypal.com (PayPal) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:23:00 +0800 Subject: Account Review Team Message-ID: <200602112123.k1BLN0r26557@server7.galacnet.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maurice at stanford.edu Tue Feb 14 10:46:23 2006 From: maurice at stanford.edu (Maurice Stevens) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:46:23 -0800 Subject: Changing epi reservation limit Message-ID: <43F2257F.1010308@stanford.edu> Hi John, You have probably heard about the reservation trouble we are having on the epi. It has been requested that we put some limits on the reservation time to give everyone a chance to get time. Can you change the ReservationTotalTimePolicy on epi to the 12-ReservationTotalTimeRule? I have already sent an email to the epi users letting them know that the change in policy was coming but I did not give a specific time. Once I hear back from you I will let the users know that it is/has happening/happened. Is this something that can happens quickly or does it have to wait for a group of coral changes? -m -- maurice at stanford.edu Maurice Stevens Stanford Nanofabrication Facility CIS Room 142, Mail Code 4070 Stanford, CA 94305 P. (650)725-3660 F. (650)725.6278 From edmyers at stanford.edu Wed Feb 15 08:11:26 2006 From: edmyers at stanford.edu (Ed Myers) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:11:26 -0800 Subject: AG4100 In-Reply-To: <012701c631d7$37c1b850$22b60c80@FENG> References: <012701c631d7$37c1b850$22b60c80@FENG> Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.2.20060215081022.02a00c40@edmyers.pobox.stanford.edu> Jia, If you have a star next to the tool, you should be OK. This is a new tool, so maybe Coral's email list not set up. Ed At 06:26 PM 2/14/2006, you wrote: >Hi, Ed: > >It seems I am having difficulty receiving the email for subscribing to the >AG4100 mailing list. Would you please re-send the email to me? > >Thanks, >Jia From summit at techconnect.org Thu Feb 16 07:15:28 2006 From: summit at techconnect.org (Tech Connect Summit) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:15:28 -0800 Subject: TechConnect Summit 2006 - Invitation to Participate Message-ID: TechConnect Summit 2006 May 8-9 2006, Boston, Massachusetts Hynes Convention Center www.TechConnect.org/Summit2006/ In Partnership with Nanotech 2006 Join 300 Exhibitors & 3,000 Attendees Present your IP or Venture to the World?s Top Corporations and Investors. Proposals Due: March 3, 2006 TechConnect Summit features the leading IP and Early Stage Ventures across multiple industries and disciplines from around the world, and provides an interactive forum for the business community to connect with the world?s leading technology providers and most promising technology start-ups. To participate, please visit: www.TechConnect.org/Summit2006/ --- You are currently subscribed to nanotech as: coral at snf.stanford.edu To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nanotech-6748833M at spirit.sparklist.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From update at eBay.com Mon Feb 20 10:24:49 2006 From: update at eBay.com (update at eBay.com) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:24:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: Please update your Ebay account ! Message-ID: <20060220182449.168051DF610@localhost> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From unverifiedalert.com at comerica.com Fri Feb 24 00:34:03 2006 From: unverifiedalert.com at comerica.com (Comerica Bank) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:34:03 +0200 (EET) Subject: Comerica Bank - Security Measures! Unverified Alert Message-ID: <1140770042{33156}.qmail@ebay.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nanotech at nsti.org Fri Feb 24 10:15:17 2006 From: nanotech at nsti.org (Nano World News) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:15:17 -0800 Subject: Nano World News February 2006 Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wuxinhua9999 at vip.163.com Sun Feb 26 11:25:12 2006 From: wuxinhua9999 at vip.163.com (=?GB2312?B?bG9uZ21pbmdodWk=?=) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 03:25:12 +0800 Subject: =?GB2312?B?QW4gb3BlbiBsZXR0ZXIgdG8gQW1lcmljYW4gUHJlc2lkZW50IE1yLiBCdXNoICC+tNbCw8C5+tfczbOyvMqyz8jJ+rXEuau/qtDF?= Message-ID: <0012608581$26484305$80842552@vip.163.com> An open letter to American President Mr. Bush ?????????????? Explanation: Du Pont Chemical Company of the United State has for several times required to submit the dispute between it and our side to an arbitration organization. Respecting the requirement of Du Pont, we sent a version of ?Arbitration Agreement? in a registered letter to Du Pont on January 16, 2006, with an enclosure saying if Du Pont raises no objections, we will appreciate it if Du Pont sign and affix its seal to the agreement and mail the rest two copies back to us in 30 days. If Du Pont has objections, it may produce a version of its own. Meanwhile, we have sent the ?Arbitration Agreement? and an enclosure letter by e-mail to info.china at chn.dupont.com and info at dupont.com 24 times on January 26, February 6, February 10 and February 15, 2006 respectively. Now more than 30 days have passed, far exceeding the time that needs for finding proof and making a decision, and we have received no reply. This is most likely another trick played by Du Pont for the purpose of repudiating its debt. We therefore send this e-mail and ask for your pardon if it does any convenience to you. If possible, we request you tell Du Pont not to play this kind of trick any more. (As many people with the public relations department of the Du Pont Chemical Company excel at Chinese, the registered letter and e-mail we have sent are not translated into English.) IMPUDENT, SCOUNDREL, DuPont of the United States!??????????????! IMPUDENT, SCOUNDREL, CEO of DuPont Holliday ! DuPont Co. and its CEO Holliday are transnational scoundrel! Without open objection, DuPont is openly admitting itself to be a transnational scoundrel! We firmly believe that the United State is not a country that shields and connives at rascals and the American government is not a government that shields and connives at rascals! We request the American government actions to intensify the law enforcement strength to protect intellectual property rights,force transnational scoundrel DuPont to carry out it?s voluntarily promised obligations in the agreement. ************************************************************************************************* Hello, my respectable President Mr. Bush: The fact that DuPont declined to fulfill the agreement has been presented to you for several times via president at whitehouse.gov; As a result, president at whitehouse.gov sent back three letters containing the following same contents on the behalf of Mr. President in Sep 2004:?Thank you for e-mailing President Bush. Your ideas and comments are very important to him.? My ?ideas and comments? are as follows: it is verified by Mr. Huang with adequate facts and irrefutable legal evidences that DuPont must disburse Mr. Huang patent fee, license fee or equivalent ?Utter Compensation? fee and DuPont?s persistent refusal to disburse these fees infringes upon the intellectual property rights of Mr. Huang. president at whitehouse.gov mentioned ?are very important to him.? I don?t dare to unduly surmise the meaning of ?very important? to Mr. President; However, according to my humble opinions, there exits the following ?important?: on the one hand, respectable Mr. President, the American Government led by Mr. President as well as the great American people bitterly hate the predation of the intellectual property rights of***** others through brazen means such as stealing, shameless acts; in contrast, DuPont is committing such brazen and shameless deals; on the other hand, the number of your country?s intellectual property rights in a variety of fields is far in excess of that of any nations in the world and suffers greatly from rights infringement. Therefore, your government always reserves no efforts in urging other nations to intensify the law enforcement strength to protect your country?s intellectual property rights. However, while your government reserves no efforts in urging the Chinese government to intensify the law enforcement strength to protect your country?s intellectual property rights and receives your ?more encouraged? praise(note), DuPont is infringing the intellectual property rights of Mr. Huang through various extremely brazen and shameless means, which constitutes an extremely bad signal to the governments and public of other nations in the world, a extremely ?good? model for current and potential thieves of intellectual property rights, an enormous damage to your government protection of your country?s intellectual property rights, and a tremendous humiliation to your country?s lofty status in the world. For the sake of the glory of the great American people and the reputation of a legion of American corporations, in order to safeguard your country?s lofty status in the world and protect the intellectual property rights of your country and other nations in the world, we humbly request you and your government to prevent DuPont?s such extremely brazen infringement and even seizure behaviors, and force DuPont to carry out it?s voluntarily promised obligations in the agreement. We firmly believe that the United State is not a country that shields and connives at rascals and the American government is not a government that shields and connives at rascals; Under the instruction of our respectable Mr. President and the Americangovernment, the rascal of DuPont shall be aware of shame and be able to turn into a normal corporation by giving up shameless behaviors. Due to the adequate evidences, the clear-cut rights and obligations of both parties of DuPont and Mr. Huang, and simple legal relations, the infringement of the intellectual property rights of Mr. Huang by DuPont can be absolutely prevented and DuPont will surely disburse Mr. Huang patent fee, license fee or equivalent ?Utter Compensation? fee as long as your government intensifies the law enforcement strength to protect intellectual property rights as well. With best regards! Annex: Heartfelt thanks for your reading my E-mail and your mail of attention to this matter. I would like to make some replenishment concerning the matter, for you to judge and decide. I Abstract 1. At the request of Du Pont, Mr. Huang has for 10 times submitted written technical materials to Du Pont from April 1993 to 1994, for expert group of Du Pont to conduct feasibility analysis. 2. On February 22, 1995, Dr Robert F Sklar, Technology Transfer Licensing Manager of DuPont arrived in Shanghai in China, to ?sign many agreements? with Mr. Huang. Mr. Huang insisted DuPont examines samples first before signs any agreement. However, as samples were still in the process of purification at the time, no agreements were signed then. 3. On March 28, 1995, Mr. Huang sent the first batch of samples to Du Pont by post. 4. On September 7, 1995, Mr. Huang received ?Biological Evaluation Agreement? (1995 Agreement) sent by Du Pont, requiring Mr. Huang to sign this agreement and again provide samples. Mr. Huang signed the agreement and sent second batch of samples as requested by DuPont. DuPont admit in Article 5 of the ?1995 Agreement? that Mr. Huang will be entitled to claim patent and licensing fees. DuPont states in Article 8 of the ?1995 Agreement? that Mr. Huang may not cooperate with any universities or enterprises in any form before and after signing of this agreement (for this reason, Mr. Huang has refused cooperation request of several companies). 5. On September 10, 1998, DuPont sent a letter to Mr. Huang, asking for third batch of samples. 6. In 1999, DuPont carried out a month-long insecticide screening on the third batch of samples (in fact, it has carried out weeds killing test and mould killing test in the meantime), and required to keep all these tests a secret. 7. On June 8, 2000, DuPont sent a letter saying it was not interested in samples provided by Mr. Huang, and refused to pay Mr. Huang patent and licensing fees. 8.The mail signed by DuPont on June 2th, 2005, threaten Mr.Huang ,and prevent Mr.Huang send the E-mail. Seek response from E-mail: info at dupont.com http://www1.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontglobal/corp/contactEmail.jsp info.china at chn.dupont.com ?????????????? ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????2006.01.16.?????????????????????????????????????30????????????????????????????????????????2006.01.26.,2006.02.06.?2006.02.10.?2006.02.15.????????????36?????info.china at chn.dupont.com?info at dupont.com??????????30???????????????????????????????????????????????????????e-mail?????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????! ???????????????! ?????????????????????! ??????????,???????????????????????! ????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ************************************************************************************************* ????????????? ?????????????????president at whitehouse.gov?????president at whitehouse.gov?? 2004?9??????????????????????Thank you for e-mailing President Bush. Your ideas and comments are very important to him.????ideas and comments????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????president at whitehouse.gov??are very important to him.? ?very important??????????????????????????????important? ? 1.????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2.??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?? ??????? ?????? Chinese SXF 2005.09.17.23?59 ?? 1. ?1993?4???1994??????????????????10???????????????? ?????? 2. 1995?2?22?????????????Sklar?? ?E.I.DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY Robert F. Sklar Ph. D. Manager,Technology Transfer Licensing)??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 3 1995?3?28???????????????? 4. 1995?9?7????????????BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION AGREEMENT?1995???)?????????????????????????????????????????????????1995?????5??????????????????????????????????1995?????8?????????????????????????????????????????? ???? 5. 1998?9?10?????????????????? 6 1999????????????????Insecticide Screening??????????????????????????????????????? 7. 2000?6?8?????????????????,????????????????? 8.2005.06.02. ???????????????-??????????E-mail? (??E-mail????? info.china at chn.dupont.com , ????Contact Us:info at dupont.com http://www1.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontglobal/corp/contactEmail.jsp) (??????????????????????????????????????e-mail???????? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From oisaadat at stanford.edu Mon Feb 27 14:26:47 2006 From: oisaadat at stanford.edu (Omair Irfan Saadat) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:26:47 -0800 Subject: Problems running Remote Coral Message-ID: <8cf64daf0602271426t3cba84cftaaae232cccaaea98@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I tried running remote coral from my computer and I got the following error: An error occurred while launching/running the application. Title: Coral Remote (SNF) Vendor: Stanford Nanofabrication Facility Category: Download Error Unable to load resource: http://snf.stanford.edu/coral/etc/coral.jnlp Do you know what I should do to fix this problem? Thanks, Omair -- Omair I. Saadat Department of Electrical Engineering Stanford University From update at paypal.com Tue Feb 28 05:42:11 2006 From: update at paypal.com (update at paypal.com) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:42:11 +0900 (JST) Subject: February 2006 - Update and Verify Message-ID: <20060228134211.BAB5D8A342B1@xserveg5.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From service2006 at paypal.com Tue Feb 28 20:26:06 2006 From: service2006 at paypal.com (service.com) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:26:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: PayPal - Your account will be suspended - Act Now ! Message-ID: <1141187166{33156}.qmail@paypal.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: