DuPont in U.S., suspect of severe crime of contract fraud, must be sanctioned in accordance with the Criminal Law!

taojiaqi taojiaqi
Fri Aug 24 03:35:49 PDT 2007


DuPont in U.S., suspect of severe crime of contract fraud, must be sanctioned in accordance with the Criminal Law!

(If you log on www.google.com, copy and paste the 8-Chinese character full name of Du Pont "美国 杜邦化学公司"or the 6-Chinese character full name of Du Pont "杜邦化学公司", you could see  more than 10 published English or/and Chinese open letters by me on more than 10 pages from the  first one.) 


Honorable ladies and gentlemen: 

Mr. Huang strongly appeals to strictly sanction DuPont, the suspect of the severe crime of  contract fraud, in accordance with the regulation of Article 224, Criminal Law of the People's  Republic of China, please be generous to lend your precious support! DuPont Chemical Co. Ltd and  Mr. Huang signed Biological Evaluation Agreement which was unilaterally established by DuPont  without discussions in advance with Mr. Huang in 1995 (abbreviated for "1995 Agreement" as  below). In 1995 Agreement, DuPont forwardly promised to pay for the patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang after exclusively possessing his patented technology. After DuPont exclusively  possessed Mr. Huang's effective and nontoxic agricultural pesticide patent technology according  to 1995 Agreement, it has been refusing to pay for the patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang  without any warrant for 7 years or more. This is crime of contract fraud. The gap between the  price DuPont paid for the technology to Mr. Huang and those of similar Natural Pyrethrins-type  technologies in world markets was "extremely enormous" (not "considerably big" or "enormous ", but "extremely enormous"); many "especially severe situations" accompanied: Holliday,  President of DuPont, slandered China "a raffish country" and Mr. Huang "a rascal" for several  times; DuPont signed a letter to threaten and intimidate Mr. Huang on June 2 2005; they also  brought false charge against him before Chinese police in October 2005 but failed. Therefore,  DuPont was a suspect of severe crime of contract fraud and must be sanctioned and punished in  accordance with the Criminal Law! To summarize, DuPont is far from a transnational hoodlum for  debt repudiation, but a transnational suspect of crime of fraud. Debt repudiation means under the  premises of acknowledging the creditor's rights, the debtor postpones to repay the debt without  warrant and specific repayment period. Under the circumstance without any warrant, DuPont has  been refusing to pay for the patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang for the past 7 years or  more. Therefore, DuPont and its person in charge should be suspect of crime of contract fraud,  but not "debt repudiation", and should be strictly sanctioned in accordance with Article 224, Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. 
Since pirates were punished, DuPont should also be sanctioned according to the Criminal Law! Any  independent and sovereign country will not allow any foreigner (natural person and legal  representative) to be entitled to any illegal privilege in its own country, and China will  certainly not be exempted.  

Best regards! 

Yours sincerely
                                    Universal Agent: SXF2007.07.23.

美国杜邦,涉嫌经济合同诈骗犯罪,必须依照《刑法》制裁!

    2、对于涉嫌经济合同诈骗的认定
  《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十四条:
"……(五)以其他方法骗取对方当事人财物的"。
  《最高人民法院关于审理诈骗案件具体应用法律的若干问题的解释(1)》(1996年12月16日法发[1996]32号 )(注)
   "根据《刑法》第一百五十一条和第一百五十二条的规定,利用经济合同诈骗他人财物数额较大的,构成诈 骗罪。
"利用经济合同进行诈骗的,诈骗数额应当以行为人实际骗取的数额认定,合同标的数额可以作为量刑情节予 以考虑。
"行为人具有下列情形之一的,应认定其行为属于以非法占有为目的,利用经济合同进行诈骗:
"……
"(六)合同签订后,以支付部分货款,开始履行合同为诱饵,骗取全部货物后,在合同规定的期限内或者双方 另行约定的付款期限内,无正当理由拒不支付其余货款的。
"(1)《中华人民共和国刑法》第224条"
(注  国务院法制办公室《刑事法律全书》P1-313  中国法制出版社  2007年 北京)

杜邦公司是在合同签订时,以向黄先生支付专利费和许可证费为诱饵,骗取黄先生的全部专利技术后,在合同 规定的期限内,无正当理由,拒绝向黄先生支付专利费用和许可证费,应认定其行为属于以非法占有为目的,利 用经济合同进行诈骗。

 
(如果您上www.google.com网站搜索,复制"美国杜邦化学公司"  8 个汉字或"美国杜邦化学公司"  6  个 汉字的全名粘贴在"搜索框"中,就可在从第1网页开始的10多个网页内搜索到我已经发表过的10多封英文或/ 及中文公开信。)

尊敬的女仕们、先生们,各位好! 
 
 黄先生强烈呼吁将美国杜邦涉嫌犯严重经济合同诈骗罪的问题按照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十四条的 规定严加制裁,敬请您给予宝贵的帮助!
 美国杜邦化学公司和黄先生在1995年签订了完全由杜邦公司单方面制订、未与黄先生作任何协商的《生物效应 鉴定协议(BIOLOGICAL  EVALUATION  AGREEMENT)》(以下简称《1995年协议》)。在《1995年协议》中,杜 邦主动承诺在独占了黄先生的专利技术后,将向黄先生支付专利费和许可证费。然而杜邦根据《1995年协议》 完全独占了黄先生的这项高效、无毒农业杀虫剂专利技术后,杜邦在毫无任何正当理由的情况下7年多来一直拒 绝向黄先生支付专费和许可证费,这是利用经济合同的诈骗; 杜邦从黄先生手中获得的这一技术的价格与世界 市场上类似的杀虫菊酯(Natural Pyrethrins)类技术价格相比"数额特别巨大"(不是"较大"或"巨大" 而是"特别巨大");并伴有美国杜邦总裁贺利得(Holliday)多次诬蔑中国(P.R.China)是无赖国家、黄先 生是无赖分子,杜邦在2005.06.02.签署信件对黄先生进行威胁-恫吓 ;在2005年10月中旬到中国公安机关对黄 先生进行诬告陷害未遂这些"特别严重情节"。因此,美国杜邦涉嫌严重经济合同诈骗犯罪,必须依照《刑法 》严加制裁!
 综上所述,美国杜邦远远不是赖帐的跨国流氓,而是跨国诈骗犯罪的嫌犯。"赖帐"是指债务人在承认债权人 债权的前提下,无正当理由、无明确偿还期限的拖延偿还债务的行为。杜邦却是7年多来一直在毫无任何正当理 由的情况下拒绝向黄先生支付专费和许可证费。因此,美国杜邦化学公司及其负责人应该是涉嫌犯经济合同诈 骗罪,而不是"赖帐",应该按照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十四条严加制裁。
 对盗版者都已处罚,对杜邦更应该按照《刑法》制裁!任何主权完全独立的国家,都绝对不允许任何外国人( 自然人和法人)在自己的国家享有任何非法特权,中国当然也不例外。
 此致 
最崇高的敬礼! 
 
                                        全责代理人:SXF 2007.07.23. 




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/coral/attachments/20070824/9a6a453f/attachment.html>


More information about the coral mailing list