From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Mon Aug 1 09:10:35 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:10:35 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/1/2005 Message-ID: <42EE497B.1000501@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Tue Aug 2 08:54:32 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 08:54:32 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/2/2005 Message-ID: <42EF9738.8040302@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Wed Aug 3 09:16:25 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 09:16:25 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/3/2005 Message-ID: <42F0EDD9.3000009@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Thu Aug 4 09:29:11 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:29:11 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/4/2005 Message-ID: <42F24257.5060006@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Fri Aug 5 08:23:29 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 08:23:29 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/5/2005 Message-ID: <42F38471.6030900@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Mon Aug 8 08:53:38 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:53:38 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/8/2005 Message-ID: <42F78002.3080605@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Tue Aug 9 08:45:00 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 08:45:00 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/9/2005 Message-ID: <42F8CF7C.90208@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Wed Aug 10 08:41:50 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:41:50 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/10/2005 Message-ID: <42FA203E.7040100@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nanotech at nsti.org Wed Aug 10 11:41:30 2005 From: nanotech at nsti.org (Nano World News) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:41:30 -0700 Subject: Nano World News August 2005 Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Thu Aug 11 08:28:56 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:28:56 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/11/2005 Message-ID: <42FB6EB8.6000902@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Fri Aug 12 08:15:47 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:15:47 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/12/2005 Message-ID: <42FCBD23.5050807@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nanotech at nsti.org Fri Aug 12 08:10:05 2005 From: nanotech at nsti.org (NSTI) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:10:05 -0700 Subject: Fall Nano Courses & Impact Summit - October 17-19 Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Thu Aug 18 07:39:12 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:39:12 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/18/2005 Message-ID: <43049D90.1010700@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From service at bankofthewest.com Thu Aug 18 08:30:30 2005 From: service at bankofthewest.com (service at bankofthewest.com) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:30:30 -0700 Subject: Protect Yourself Against Fraud Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nanotech at nsti.org Thu Aug 18 12:22:48 2005 From: nanotech at nsti.org (NSTI) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:22:48 -0700 Subject: Fall Nano Courses & Impact Summit - October 17-19 Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From service at paypal.com Tue Aug 23 06:55:54 2005 From: service at paypal.com (PayPal Inc.) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:55:54 -0400 Subject: Immediate Action Required Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From service at paypal.com Tue Aug 23 07:31:04 2005 From: service at paypal.com (PayPal Inc.) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:31:04 -0400 Subject: Immediate Action Required Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Wed Aug 24 08:47:20 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:47:20 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/24/2005 Message-ID: <430C9688.20702@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Thu Aug 25 09:12:24 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:12:24 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/25/2005 Message-ID: <430DEDE8.1020503@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sunwenhai999 at sina.com Fri Aug 26 03:46:50 2005 From: sunwenhai999 at sina.com (=?GB2312?B?bG9uZ21pbmdodWk=?=) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:46:50 +0800 Subject: =?GB2312?B?UmVxdWVzdCB5b3UgZGVub3VuY2UgYW5kIHByZXZlbnQgdGhlIEFtZXJpY2FuIER1UG9udCBpbXB1ZGVudGx5IGZvcmNpYmx5IG9jY3VweSBpbnRlbGxlY3R1YWwgcHJvcGVydHkgb2YgTXIuSHVhbmch?= Message-ID: <0012152787$07771876$01012266@sina.com> Request you denounce and prevent the American DuPont impudently forcibly occupy intellectual property of Mr.Huang! impudent DuPont CO.! impudent Holliday!impudent! impudent!! exceeding impudence!!! DuPont and CEO Holliday are transnational scoundre! Seek response from E-mail: info.china at chn.dupont.com http://www1.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontglobal/corp/contactEmail.jsp president at whitehouse.gov Postmaster at doc.gov Does DuPont dare to deny openly? It does not dare, absolutely does not dare. With ironclad evidence before it, what qualification does it has to deny? There is a proverb saying ?Qui non improbat, approvat?. Without open objection, DuPont is openly admitting itself to be a transnational scoundrel, trampling on the human and national dignity of creditors. repudiate a debt + vilify = scoundrel repudiate a debt + vilify + threaten = impudently forcibly occupy Ladies and Gentlemen: My friend, Mr. Huang, is patent holder of a highly efficient and nontoxic farm pesticide production technology of People?s Republic of China. However, in 1995, without negotiating with Mr. Huang, DuPont Chemical Company of the United States has unilaterally worked out a ?1995 Agreement? and took the patent technology solely as its own, and has been refusing to pay Mr. Huang any technology transfer fee or ?full compensation?. More despicable is that DuPont Board Director and CEO Holliday has for three times vilified Mr. Huang as a scoundrel and the People?s Republic of China as a country of scoundrels on the obverse side of Mr. Huang?s ?refused? envelope, and said Mr. Huang, as a citizen of the People?s Republic of China, is not entitled, as citizens of other countries do, to claim his right with DuPont according to laws of civilized countries and practice of civilized people. Since the summer of 2000, Mr. Huang has time and again produced sufficient factual evidences and irrefutable legal basis for DuPont to perform the agreement or conduct full compensation by way of writing letters, sending facsimiles, making telephone calls and face-to-face negotiation. And contrary to this, DuPont is unable to produce any factual evidences and legal basis neither for not performing the agreement nor for not conducting full compensation, but takes the attitude of ??absolutely? not performing the agreement nor conducting full compensation, and ?you may do as you like?. Here I want to ask who is the scoundrel (a transnational scoundrel)? What kind of qualification has Holliday obtained to do so? In summing up, Holliday and DuPont are undoubtedly scoundrels. Or more correctly, Holliday is a transnational scoundrel, while DuPont is a multinational scoundrel. In order to safeguard the basic economic order as well as the basic ethics in the world, Mr. Huang here sincerely request all ladies, gentlemen, CEOs, experts and men of noble characters to let it know to Holliday and DuPont that laws of civilized countries cannot be trampled on, the basic ethics of the society cannot be ruined, respect and equal treatment to China and the Chinese people are necessary, and to repudiate debts cannot fatten itself. DuPont must observe the obligations it has promised in the agreement, let alone the commitment it made initiatively. It must pay patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang and may by no means go back on its words. If it dares to take goods and does not pay, it certainly dares to take the money and does not deliver the goods, or deliver fake products, or deliver products of inferior quality. Who will be the next victim? At what time? And what?s the amount? Who can guarantee? Therefore, Mr. Huang request all of you, CEOs, technical experts, men of noble characters, and Chinese compatriots: guard your property and wealth against Holliday and DuPont. Though you are fully capable of smashing the scheme of Holliday and DuPont, it is a waste of time, energy and money to do so; keep away from them and avoid various exchanges with them. Mr. Huang sincerely suggests you check whether you have fallen into the trap of Holliday, or the trap of DuPont? If you have, go straightly to them and get even with them. Otherwise you will be taken as automatic disclaimers of power once the ?validity of legal prescription? passes. With best regards Empowered person: SXF Annex: Heartfelt thanks for your reading my E-mail and your mail of attention to this matter. I would like to make some replenishment concerning the matter, for you to judge and decide. I Abstract 1. At the request of Du Pont, Mr. Huang has for 10 times submitted written technical materials to Du Pont from April 1993 to 1994, for expert group of Du Pont to conduct feasibility analysis. 2. On February 22, 1995, Dr Robert F Sklar, Technology Transfer Licensing Manager of DuPont arrived in Shanghai in China, to ?sign many agreements? with Mr. Huang. Mr. Huang insisted DuPont examines samples first before signs any agreement. However, as samples were still in the process of purification at the time, no agreements were signed then. 3. On March 28, 1995, Mr. Huang sent the first batch of samples to Du Pont by post. 4. On September 7, 1995, Mr. Huang received ?Biological Evaluation Agreement? (1995 Agreement) sent by Du Pont, requiring Mr. Huang to sign this agreement and again provide samples. Mr. Huang signed the agreement and sent second batch of samples as requested by DuPont. DuPont admit in Article 5 of the ?1995 Agreement? that Mr. Huang will be entitled to claim patent and licensing fees. DuPont states in Article 8 of the ?1995 Agreement? that Mr. Huang may not cooperate with any universities or enterprises in any form before and after signing of this agreement (for this reason, Mr. Huang has refused cooperation request of several companies). 5. On September 10, 1998, DuPont sent a letter to Mr. Huang, asking for third batch of samples. 6. In 1999, DuPont carried out a month-long insecticide screening on the third batch of samples (in fact, it has carried out weeds killing test and mould killing test in the meantime), and required to keep all these tests a secret. 7. On June 8, 2000, DuPont sent a letter saying it was not interested in samples provided by Mr. Huang, and refused to pay Mr. Huang patent and licensing fees. 8.The mail signed by DuPont on June 2th, 2005, threaten Mr.Huang ,and prevent Mr.Huang send the E-mail. ????????!???????! ???????????????????! ??E-mail????? info.china at chn.dupont.com , ????Contact Us: http://www1.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontglobal/corp/contactEmail.jsp president at whitehouse.gov Postmaster at doc.gov ??????????? ??!??!!????!!! ???????????? ????,?????!???????? ??????????????????? ?????????????! ? ?????????,???????????????????????! ????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????! ?????? + ???? = ???????? ?????? + ???? + ??-?? = ???????? ????????? ??????????E-mail???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????1995??????????? ????????????????1995?????????????????????????????? ??????????1995?????5?????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????Holliday???????????????????? ?REFUSED????????????????????????????????P?R?China?????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????? ?2000????????????????????????E-mail?????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????!????????????????????? ???????????????????!???????????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????Holliday???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????Holliday?????,?? ? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ??! ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????????????????Holliday????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????! ?????????????????? ????????????????????????Holliday???????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ?? ??????? ??????SXF (??? ?? 1. ?1993?4???1994??????????????????10???????????????? ?????? 2. 1995?2?22?????????????Sklar?? ?E.I.DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY Robert F. Sklar Ph. D. Manager,Technology Transfer Licensing)????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????? 3 1995?3?28???????????????? 4. 1995?9?7????????????BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION AGREEMENT?1995???)??????? ??????????????????????????????????????????1995???? ?5??????????????????????????????????1995?????8????? ????????????????????????????????????? ???? 5. 1998?9?10?????????????????? 6 1999????????????????Insecticide Screening?????????????????? ????????????????????? 7. 2000?6?8?????????????????,????????????????? 8.2005.06.02. ???????????????-??????????E-mail? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Fri Aug 26 10:14:03 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:14:03 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/26/2005 Message-ID: <430F4DDB.4010306@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu Tue Aug 30 09:30:23 2005 From: eenriquez at snf.stanford.edu (Elmer Enriquez) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:30:23 -0700 Subject: Etch Group morning equipment status: 8/30/2005 Message-ID: <4314899F.5060506@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 2857 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nanotech at nsti.org Tue Aug 30 09:23:22 2005 From: nanotech at nsti.org (NSTI) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:23:22 -0700 Subject: Nano Impact Summit - Oct. 19th, Washington DC Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From exe9999927 at sohu.com Wed Aug 31 08:55:48 2005 From: exe9999927 at sohu.com (=?GB2312?B?bG9uZ21pbmdodWk=?=) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:55:48 +0800 Subject: =?GB2312?B?UmVxdWVzdCB5b3UgZGVub3VuY2UgYW5kIHByZXZlbnQgdGhlIEFtZXJpY2FuIER1UG9udCBpbXB1ZGVudGx5IGZvcmNpYmx5IG9jY3VweSBpbnRlbGxlY3R1YWwgcHJvcGVydHkgb2YgTXIuSHVhbmch?= Message-ID: <0012832678$57421531$41618018@sohu.com> Request you denounce and prevent the American DuPont impudently forcibly occupy intellectual property of Mr.Huang! impudent DuPont CO.! impudent Holliday! impudent! impudent!! exceeding impudence!!! DuPont and CEO Holliday are transnational scoundre! Seek response from E-mail: info.china at chn.dupont.com http://www1.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontglobal/corp/contactEmail.jsp president at whitehouse.gov Postmaster at doc.gov Does DuPont dare to deny openly? It does not dare, absolutely does not dare. With ironclad evidence before it, what qualification does it has to deny? There is a proverb saying ?Qui non improbat, approvat?. Without open objection, DuPont is openly admitting itself to be a transnational scoundrel, trampling on the human and national dignity of creditors. repudiate a debt + vilify = scoundrel repudiate a debt + vilify + threaten = impudently forcibly occupy Your Excellency: My friend, Mr. Huang, is patent holder of a highly efficient and nontoxic farm pesticide production technology of People?s Republic of China. However, in 1995, without negotiating with Mr. Huang, DuPont Chemical Company of the United States has unilaterally worked out a ?1995 Agreement? and took the patent technology solely as its own, and has been refusing to pay Mr. Huang any technology transfer fee or ?full compensation?. More despicable is that DuPont Board Director and CEO Holliday has for three times vilified Mr. Huang as a scoundrel and the People?s Republic of China as a country of scoundrels on the obverse side of Mr. Huang?s ?refused? envelope, and said Mr. Huang, as a citizen of the People?s Republic of China, is not entitled, as citizens of other countries do, to claim his right with DuPont according to laws of civilized countries and practice of civilized people. Since the summer of 2000, Mr. Huang has time and again produced sufficient factual evidences and irrefutable legal basis for DuPont to perform the agreement or conduct full compensation by way of writing letters, sending facsimiles, making telephone calls and face-to-face negotiation. And contrary to this, DuPont is unable to produce any factual evidences and legal basis neither for not performing the agreement nor for not conducting full compensation, but takes the attitude of ??absolutely? not performing the agreement nor conducting full compensation, and ?you may do as you like?. Here I want to ask who is the scoundrel (a transnational scoundrel)? What kind of qualification has Holliday obtained to do so? In summing up, Holliday and DuPont are undoubtedly scoundrels. Or more correctly, Holliday is a transnational scoundrel, while DuPont is a multinational scoundrel. In order to safeguard the basic economic order as well as the basic ethics in the world, Mr. Huang here sincerely request all ladies, gentlemen, CEOs, experts and men of noble characters to let it know to Holliday and DuPont that laws of civilized countries cannot be trampled on, the basic ethics of the society cannot be ruined, respect and equal treatment to China and the Chinese people are necessary, and to repudiate debts cannot fatten itself. DuPont must observe the obligations it has promised in the agreement, let alone the commitment it made initiatively. It must pay patent fee and license fee to Mr. Huang and may by no means go back on its words. If it dares to take goods and does not pay, it certainly dares to take the money and does not deliver the goods, or deliver fake products, or deliver products of inferior quality. Who will be the next victim? At what time? And what?s the amount? Who can guarantee? Therefore, Mr. Huang request all of you, CEOs, technical experts, men of noble characters, and Chinese compatriots: guard your property and wealth against Holliday and DuPont. Though you are fully capable of smashing the scheme of Holliday and DuPont, it is a waste of time, energy and money to do so; keep away from them and avoid various exchanges with them. Mr. Huang sincerely suggests you check whether you have fallen into the trap of Holliday, or the trap of DuPont? If you have, go straightly to them and get even with them. Otherwise you will be taken as automatic disclaimers of power once the ?validity of legal prescription? passes. With best regards Empowered person: SXF Annex: Heartfelt thanks for your reading my E-mail and your mail of attention to this matter. I would like to make some replenishment concerning the matter, for you to judge and decide. I Abstract 1. At the request of Du Pont, Mr. Huang has for 10 times submitted written technical materials to Du Pont from April 1993 to 1994, for expert group of Du Pont to conduct feasibility analysis. 2. On February 22, 1995, Dr Robert F Sklar, Technology Transfer Licensing Manager of DuPont arrived in Shanghai in China, to ?sign many agreements? with Mr. Huang. Mr. Huang insisted DuPont examines samples first before signs any agreement. However, as samples were still in the process of purification at the time, no agreements were signed then. 3. On March 28, 1995, Mr. Huang sent the first batch of samples to Du Pont by post. 4. On September 7, 1995, Mr. Huang received ?Biological Evaluation Agreement? (1995 Agreement) sent by Du Pont, requiring Mr. Huang to sign this agreement and again provide samples. Mr. Huang signed the agreement and sent second batch of samples as requested by DuPont. DuPont admit in Article 5 of the ?1995 Agreement? that Mr. Huang will be entitled to claim patent and licensing fees. DuPont states in Article 8 of the ?1995 Agreement? that Mr. Huang may not cooperate with any universities or enterprises in any form before and after signing of this agreement (for this reason, Mr. Huang has refused cooperation request of several companies). 5. On September 10, 1998, DuPont sent a letter to Mr. Huang, asking for third batch of samples. 6. In 1999, DuPont carried out a month-long insecticide screening on the third batch of samples (in fact, it has carried out weeds killing test and mould killing test in the meantime), and required to keep all these tests a secret. 7. On June 8, 2000, DuPont sent a letter saying it was not interested in samples provided by Mr. Huang, and refused to pay Mr. Huang patent and licensing fees. 8.The mail signed by DuPont on June 2th, 2005, threaten Mr.Huang ,and prevent Mr.Huang send the E-mail. ????????????,??????????????????????????????! ???????!??????! ???????????????????! ??????????????????! ??E-mail????? info.china at chn.dupont.com , ????Contact Us: http://www1.dupont.com/NASApp/dupontglobal/corp/contactEmail.jsp president at whitehouse.gov Postmaster at doc.gov ??????????? ??!??!!????!!! ???????????? ????,?????!???????? ??????????????????? ?????????????! ? ?????????,???????????????????????! ????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????! ?????? + ???? = ???????? ?????? + ???? + ??-?? = ???????? ????????? ??????????E-mail???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????1995???????????????????????????1995?????????????????????????????? ??????????1995?????5?????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????Holliday???????????????????? ?REFUSED????????????????????????????????P?R?China?????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?2000????????????????????????E-mail?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????!????????????????????? ???????????????????!???????????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Holliday???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Holliday?????,?? ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????! ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????????????????Holliday????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????! ?????????????????? ????????????????????????Holliday??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ?? ??????? ??????SXF (??? ?? 1. ?1993?4???1994??????????????????10???????????????? ?????? 2. 1995?2?22?????????????Sklar?? ?E.I.DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY Robert F. Sklar Ph. D. Manager,Technology Transfer Licensing)??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 3 1995?3?28???????????????? 4. 1995?9?7????????????BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION AGREEMENT?1995???)?????????????????????????????????????????????????1995?????5??????????????????????????????????1995?????8?????????????????????????????????????????? ???? 5. 1998?9?10?????????????????? 6 1999????????????????Insecticide Screening??????????????????????????????????????? 7. 2000?6?8?????????????????,????????????????? 8.2005.06.02. ???????????????-??????????E-mail? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: