From mahnaz at stanford.edu  Fri Jan 23 12:39:03 2009
From: mahnaz at stanford.edu (Mahnaz Mansourpour)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:39:03 -0800
Subject: Steel vs. quartz
Message-ID: <497A2AE7.80803@stanford.edu>


Hello all,

Today  we experienced few issues on the bonder and I am trying to 
clarify and set rules straight.

Although the latest rules  are posted on the system I can see that 
easily can be overlooked or just one can   ignore it.

Just making the reservation does not justify that you would find the 
system in the mode you need, especially when the reservation has been 
made back to back and the individulas have not communicated with each 
other. To switch from steel to quartz or visa versa due to the temp of 
the plates, it requires time and   this has been communicated to all of 
you during tool  training and in writing so if this understood. the only 
other issue will be that the usage for anodic vs.eutectic  bonding has 
changed?

As of right now,  we are set for Monday, Wednesday and Friday quartz 
plate and weekend in quartz ( unless no reservation and some one request 
steel) , will this wok for few of you whom using the system more than 
others?

Please get back to me as soon as possible as  I did not like the 
situation staffs  was put in this morning.
I have to add that Gary and Mario have made comments on the tool every 
time they changed the plate so simply by looking at the comment one 
should know how to go about the reservation.
I will leave the rules as it is unless I hear form you  and  I am asking 
you to please honor it.

mahnaz