From vilanova at snf.stanford.edu Tue Oct 3 11:43:28 2006 From: vilanova at snf.stanford.edu (vilanova at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:43:28 -0700 Subject: Comment headway2 SNF 2006-08-25 15:17:14: Chuck tilting slighly to back Message-ID: ADJUSTED CHUCK AND BENCH ,CHUCK RIGHT ON THE CENTER RIGHT NOW, PLEASE BE NICE TO IT. WHEN PUT IN THE WAFER IN DONT PRESS TO HARD ON IT. From uyoon at snf.stanford.edu Mon Oct 9 16:17:32 2006 From: uyoon at snf.stanford.edu (uyoon at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:17:32 -0700 Subject: Shutdown headway2 SNF 2006-10-09 16:17:31: Message-ID: vacuum line is clogged and need to be cleaned out. From changyol at snf.stanford.edu Tue Oct 10 08:25:16 2006 From: changyol at snf.stanford.edu (changyol at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:25:16 -0700 Subject: Shutdown headway2 SNF 2006-10-09 16:17:31: Message-ID: cleaned vacuum solenoid valve. From hansj at snf.stanford.edu Sun Oct 15 17:03:35 2006 From: hansj at snf.stanford.edu (hansj at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:03:35 -0700 Subject: Problem headway2 SNF 2006-10-15 17:03:35: not working Message-ID: From vilanova at snf.stanford.edu Mon Oct 16 07:35:46 2006 From: vilanova at snf.stanford.edu (vilanova at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:35:46 -0700 Subject: Problem headway2 SNF 2006-10-15 17:03:35: not working Message-ID: replaced burned Fuse, cycled wafer , ok to use. From vilanova at snf.stanford.edu Mon Oct 23 14:09:43 2006 From: vilanova at snf.stanford.edu (vilanova at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:09:43 -0700 Subject: Comment headway2 SNF 2006-10-23 14:09:43: POlished Chucks Message-ID: I just Got the 2 ( 4" ) Back from machine shop, they have been Cleaned and polished , Replaced Both O rings ( in/out) Tested them , Good to use. Be nice and clean them up after Use , Especially after Using Su8 Developer. From mahnaz at stanford.edu Wed Oct 25 16:56:15 2006 From: mahnaz at stanford.edu (Mahnaz Mansourpour) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:56:15 -0700 Subject: Nanospec Message-ID: <453FF99F.1030509@stanford.edu> Hello all, some how we lost the filter for nanospec few days a go. I tired to make another one not realizing that I have put in wrong filter any how a day later Uli goes in and finds the filter and I had to make a new holder for the correct filter. The moral of this email is that there is a little clear box next to the Nanospec and if the filter is not needed should go in there so the next person see it and knows that the filter is not in the system ( it is critical for people checking the resist thickness on their sample and still like to do exposure on it). Throwing the filter on the table of course will brake the holder. Please help us to maintain some standard in the lab, I CAN NOT KEEP UP. mahnaz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: