From jimkruger at yahoo.com Tue Dec 1 17:56:44 2009 From: jimkruger at yahoo.com (jim kruger) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:56:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec released tomorrow, 12-2-09 11:30 to 14:00 EOM Message-ID: <331884.91966.qm@web38904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From mferrier at stanford.edu Tue Dec 1 18:26:39 2009 From: mferrier at stanford.edu (Marlene Ferrier) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:26:39 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec released wed 6:30 to 8:30 am Message-ID: <34222798.4736151259720799238.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> From bilee at stanford.edu Wed Dec 2 17:21:55 2009 From: bilee at stanford.edu (Byoungil Lee) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:21:55 -0800 Subject: innotec released 0-2am on Thursday Message-ID: <0745EBF33C9A4078B900C5A219C19DE0@BILEEOFFICE> Innotec released 0-2am on Thursday. -- Byoungil Lee Ph.D Candidate in Electrical Engineering Center for Integrated Systems Stanford University Phone: +1-650-796-9791 Email: bilee at stanford.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhaydon at stanford.edu Thu Dec 3 15:12:03 2009 From: jhaydon at stanford.edu (Jim Haydon) Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:12:03 -0800 Subject: chiller Message-ID: <4B1845C3.60802@stanford.edu> I have been told that a new compressor for the chiller has been ordered and should be here Friday. It should be installed by evening but will need an over night leak check and so probably won't be up until Monday. Sorry for the inconvenience. Jim From jimkruger at yahoo.com Thu Dec 3 17:15:49 2009 From: jimkruger at yahoo.com (jim kruger) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:15:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec released Tuesday 12-8-09 1500-1730 EOM Message-ID: <32747.16944.qm@web38903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From jhaydon at stanford.edu Fri Dec 4 10:35:11 2009 From: jhaydon at stanford.edu (Jim Haydon) Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:35:11 -0800 Subject: New heat exchanger installed Message-ID: <4B19565F.3090406@stanford.edu> I have installed a new heat exchanger on the Innotec and so the tool is ok to use. However I do not want tungsten deposited over the weekend until I can make sure I have proper flow for that material. Thanks Jim From jperez at snf.stanford.edu Fri Dec 4 11:03:08 2009 From: jperez at snf.stanford.edu (Jeannie Perez) Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:03:08 -0800 Subject: Had canceled today's Training, Innotec available now at 11 AM 12/4/09 Message-ID: <4B195CEC.60906@snf.stanford.edu> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jperez.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 326 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bilee at stanford.edu Fri Dec 4 17:18:15 2009 From: bilee at stanford.edu (Byoungil Lee) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:18:15 -0800 Subject: innotec free 0-2am Saturday Message-ID: <95F34ADFAFE641A28222075DB2941A4D@BILEEOFFICE> innotec free 0-2am on Saturday. -- Byoungil Lee Ph.D Candidate in Electrical Engineering Center for Integrated Systems Stanford University Phone: +1-650-796-9791 Email: bilee at stanford.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mferrier at stanford.edu Fri Dec 4 23:15:22 2009 From: mferrier at stanford.edu (Marlene Ferrier) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:15:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec free sat 8-10am Message-ID: <1420450821.1171259997322530.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> From mkseo at stanford.edu Sat Dec 5 08:50:58 2009 From: mkseo at stanford.edu (Min-Kyo Seo) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:50:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec released Sun (Dec.6) 8:30PM-10:30PM (EOM) Message-ID: <796808514.19741260031858810.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> From gthareja at stanford.edu Sat Dec 5 20:43:09 2009 From: gthareja at stanford.edu (Gaurav Thareja) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 20:43:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: W + Al in Innotec In-Reply-To: <29717723.104781260074359479.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <2059460011.105141260074589996.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Dear Innotec users. I would appreciate your advice. I plan to deposit a bilayer metal on ALD Al2O3 W - 10nm Al - 100nm Is there a good adhesion between W and Al ? thanks -Gaurav From sonnyvo at gmail.com Sat Dec 5 21:04:15 2009 From: sonnyvo at gmail.com (sonnyv) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:04:15 -0800 Subject: W + Al in Innotec References: <29717723.104781260074359479.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> <2059460011.105141260074589996.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <000201ca7631$8fb04750$af10d5f0$@com> Ti or Cr are generally good wetting layers. I'd recommend you deposit 5nm of Ti and then enjoy a glass of Shiraz. Best Regards, Sonny ! __________________________________________________ "What makes the desert beautiful," said the Little Prince ,"is that somewhere it hides a well ." _.--. _ ;,- `' ( ,,, ( E#=====#############=: ] :_"' ,._( ``` `--' rock on Sonny Vo Ph.d candidate Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University (626) 202-8379 Harris Research Group: http://snow.stanford.edu/index.html -----Original Message----- From: Gaurav Thareja [mailto:gthareja at stanford.edu] Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 8:43 PM To: innotec Subject: W + Al in Innotec Dear Innotec users. I would appreciate your advice. I plan to deposit a bilayer metal on ALD Al2O3 W - 10nm Al - 100nm Is there a good adhesion between W and Al ? thanks -Gaurav From sroonter at stanford.edu Sun Dec 6 17:47:48 2009 From: sroonter at stanford.edu (Saeroonter Oh) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:47:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec res released Tuesday 10PM~12AM Message-ID: <977781221.183491260150468988.JavaMail.root@zm03.stanford.edu> Innotec reservation released for Tuesday 10PM~12AM From yiyangg at stanford.edu Sun Dec 6 17:50:07 2009 From: yiyangg at stanford.edu (Yiyang Gong) Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:50:07 -0800 Subject: Innotec res released Tuesday 10PM~12AM In-Reply-To: <977781221.183491260150468988.JavaMail.root@zm03.stanford.edu> References: <977781221.183491260150468988.JavaMail.root@zm03.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <4B1C5F4F.1020409@stanford.edu> Taken, and released Wednesday 5-8am. Yiyang Saeroonter Oh wrote: > Innotec reservation released for Tuesday 10PM~12AM > From jimkruger at yahoo.com Sun Dec 6 18:38:21 2009 From: jimkruger at yahoo.com (jim kruger) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:38:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec released Monday, Dec 7, 11:00 to 13:30 EOM Message-ID: <578343.30286.qm@web38903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From mferrier at stanford.edu Sun Dec 6 18:49:14 2009 From: mferrier at stanford.edu (Marlene Ferrier) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:49:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec released moday 1:30-3:30pm Message-ID: <2028548553.173301260154154011.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> From usharaghuram at gmail.com Sun Dec 6 20:19:02 2009 From: usharaghuram at gmail.com (Usha Raghuram) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 20:19:02 -0800 Subject: Ion gauge turned off during pump down - Cryo temp was getting high Message-ID: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtang at stanford.edu Tue Dec 8 08:07:05 2009 From: mtang at stanford.edu (Mary Tang) Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:07:05 -0800 Subject: Reservation for 10 -3 released today Message-ID: <4B1E79A9.2000009@stanford.edu> -- Mary X. Tang, Ph.D. Stanford Nanofabrication Facility CIS Room 136, Mail Code 4070 Stanford, CA 94305 (650)723-9980 mtang at stanford.edu http://snf.stanford.edu From usharaghuram at gmail.com Tue Dec 8 15:09:56 2009 From: usharaghuram at gmail.com (Usha Raghuram) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:09:56 -0800 Subject: Innotec will be available earlier Message-ID: May be done with Innotec before 4:30 today. Next reservation at 5:30 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From yiyangg at stanford.edu Tue Dec 8 18:32:11 2009 From: yiyangg at stanford.edu (Yiyang Gong) Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:32:11 -0800 Subject: Tuesday night 10-12pm canceled Message-ID: <4B1F0C2B.5010806@stanford.edu> Took earlier session. From mferrier at stanford.edu Tue Dec 8 18:58:08 2009 From: mferrier at stanford.edu (Marlene Ferrier) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:58:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec free now until 8:30pm Message-ID: <1151674659.825301260327488234.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> From jimkruger at yahoo.com Tue Dec 8 20:24:43 2009 From: jimkruger at yahoo.com (jim kruger) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:24:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec released Wed, 12-9-09 11:00 to 13:30 EOM Message-ID: <430782.85500.qm@web38902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From sgchong at stanford.edu Tue Dec 8 20:52:57 2009 From: sgchong at stanford.edu (Soogine Chong) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:52:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec free 4-6:30PM tomorrow (Wed. Dec.9) Message-ID: <79432205.833281260334377515.JavaMail.root@zm07.stanford.edu> From bilee at stanford.edu Tue Dec 8 20:56:45 2009 From: bilee at stanford.edu (Byoungil Lee) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:56:45 -0800 Subject: Innotec Thursday 1-3 am canceled. References: <4B1F0C2B.5010806@stanford.edu> Message-ID: <6F93C2F727934D22B6482ED0AA339868@BILEEOFFICE> Innotec Thursday 1-3 am canceled. From usharaghuram at gmail.com Tue Dec 8 21:01:31 2009 From: usharaghuram at gmail.com (Usha Raghuram) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:01:31 -0800 Subject: Released Innotec reservation for Friday, Dec 11, from 7:30-9:30AM Message-ID: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gthareja at stanford.edu Tue Dec 8 21:17:34 2009 From: gthareja at stanford.edu (Gaurav Thareja) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:17:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec free for the next user, took an earlier time slot. Message-ID: <1567688449.722571260335854585.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> From ahazeghi at stanford.edu Tue Dec 8 21:30:42 2009 From: ahazeghi at stanford.edu (Arash Hazeghi) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:30:42 -0800 Subject: innotec free for the next user, took an earlier time slot. In-Reply-To: <1567688449.722571260335854585.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> References: <1567688449.722571260335854585.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <011601ca7890$c005cdb0$40116910$@edu> Thanks, I took the next slot and will start at 10. Arash ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arash Hazeghi PhD Candidate Stanford Center for Integrated Systems CIS-X 300, 420 Via Palou Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 phone: +1-650-725-0418 web: http://www.stanford.edu/~ahazeghi From: Gaurav Thareja [mailto:gthareja at stanford.edu] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 9:18 PM To: innotec Subject: innotec free for the next user, took an earlier time slot. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From yychung at stanford.edu Wed Dec 9 14:21:33 2009 From: yychung at stanford.edu (Yoonyoung Chung) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:21:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec Available - 6-8am TOMORROW - EOM Message-ID: <611046774.786681260397293008.JavaMail.root@zm02.stanford.edu> From edmyers at stanford.edu Wed Dec 9 15:07:49 2009 From: edmyers at stanford.edu (Ed Myers) Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:07:49 -0800 Subject: SNF's New Sputter System Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20091209132705.04cc9b58@stanford.edu> PVD lab members, If you were present at last weeks new equipment meeting, heard rumors or viewed the new equipment slides on the wiki then you know we are in the middle of purchasing a new evaporator and sputter system. The goal is add new capability and provide more capacity in the area of PVD. Many of you may or may not know, my tenure at SNF started as an industrial lab member. The company I worked for critical process step was centered around PVD, so I understand the voids in the SNF PVD tool set. During the time I was an industrial lab member and now that I'm a staff member, I have been searching for a sputter system which will meet the lab member deposition requirements and fit in to the structure of the SNF lab. I have reviewed new sputter systems as well as used systems and have not found one I felt would meet all the requirements one can think of. To bring a sputter system in to the facility will require trade-offs. Below are the choices I have made and why. If I was purchasing a sputter system for industry or for a small private R&D lab many of my choices would be different (I am a strong believer in load locks, but not this time). Let me tell you the configuration I chose and why. 1) A batch system with no load lock: I came to the answer of a batch system based on who will be changing the targets. Talking with other NNIN sites, the approach is split. In half the systems the lab members change the targets (similar to the Innotec and Metallica) and half have the staff change the targets on a set schedule. If we chose a load lock system, the sputter will be down for half a day or so with each scheduled change. We should go through and extended initial pump down to get back to a good base pressure, but then each deposition would be on the order of a half hour per wafer. PROS: No schedule on the type of material which is available for deposition, Any material type can be deposited during your reservation slot, looking at a 4 wafer (4") batch size (or equivalent pieces), Deposition times will be comparable to the Innotec or Metallica, CONS: Higher background of water in the chamber for a batch system than a load lock system, Depositions will be limited to the scheduled materials, the more you open a chamber the more you have to worry about the cleanliness and particles. Comments: I chose the batch system, because I thought the lab member community would rather change the targets on an as use basis instead of waiting for scheduled target changes. 2) Number of cathodes: I looked at 5 months of Innotec depositions and found that all except 1 deposition was for 3 layers or less. Therefore, I chose to install 4 cathodes in to the batch system (cost considerations and to a lesser degree space). If the lab member community would prefer a load locked system, with scheduled target changes then we should add as many cathodes as possible. 3) Deposition power sources: The two vendors have slightly different arrangements. One vendor prefers AC over DC and one has added a pulsed DC power supply. The sputter system will have an RF source for sputtering dielectrics and the ability to do reactive sputtering as well as metallic depositions if chose AC, DC or pulsed DC. The systems will also be able to do co-depositions. Vendor A: 2 AC sources, 1 DC and 1 RF Vendor B: 2 DC, 1 Pulsed DC and 1 RF DC power supplies are what we have on the Gryphon, SCT and metallica. They require metallic targets, but can be used for reactive sputtering. The deposition rate for DC reactive sputtering is very low, significantly slower than the metallic depositions. The pulsed DC power supplies also require metallic targets, but can yield much higher deposition rated during reactive depositions. AC, or sometimes referred to mid-frequency power supplies acts very similar to pulsed DC processing. Both require metallic targets and yield high deposition rates for reactive sputtering processes. Both AC and DC control the target surface with negative pulses to discharge the surface and control arcing. RF sputtering is most often used for sputtering from dielectric targets. 4) Sample Pre-Sputter clean: This is critical and will be on either system. 5) Heating: Heating will be on both system, in the range of 500C. If this is not satisfactory please let me know (what range and why). 6) Cryo pumped: This also ties back in to the selection of who changes the targets. If we have many lab members changing targets, cryo pumps are more forgiving to errors. If we chose to go to a load locked system, then I would also consider switching over to a turbo pump. At the lab member meeting I asked for feedback. I am again asking for your input. Please respond to the questions below and with your thoughts. The goal is get the system on order as soon as we can, so please respond this week. Your comments will help define the configuration of the new sputter system. The number one and most important question I need help with is: Who should change the targets. The number two question: your comments as your window of opportunity is running out. Thanks for your help, Ed PS: I apologize to all of you who are qualified on all the PVD systems and received this email numerous times. From jweisse at stanford.edu Wed Dec 9 15:42:24 2009 From: jweisse at stanford.edu (Jeffrey M. Weisse) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:42:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec Free tonight 10:30pm - 1am Message-ID: <1835819466.895291260402144093.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> From maurice at stanford.edu Wed Dec 9 16:18:37 2009 From: maurice at stanford.edu (maurice stevens) Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:18:37 -0800 Subject: Au source contaminated Message-ID: <4B203E5D.8080700@stanford.edu> Last night a lab user reported on coral that the Au source looked contaminated. We have pulled the source from the box and are ordering another one. We don't have a delivery date on the new Au source yet. We don't know how long this source has been in this condition. If you have used it in the last few days, and are confident that it was all gold colored (it is gold and silver now) please let us know. There were several users who have used the the source since last night. I am not sure if they are aware that the source had a problem ( even though it was reported on coral and it was two different colors). At least one users has expressed interest in using the "bad" source if we don't get another one before next weeks shutdown. It is in the Innotec supply drawer under the Innotec table in a clear plastic bag. -m -- maurice at stanford.edu Maurice Stevens Stanford Nanofabrication Facility CIS Room 142, Mail Code 4070 Stanford, CA 94305 P. (650)725-3660 F. (650)725.6278 From mkseo at stanford.edu Wed Dec 9 17:28:36 2009 From: mkseo at stanford.edu (Min-Kyo Seo) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:28:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec released tomorrow (Thursday, Dec.10) 12:30 pm to 3:30 pm (EOM) Message-ID: <746114838.1103591260408516473.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> From oguz.h.elibol at intel.com Wed Dec 9 17:37:28 2009 From: oguz.h.elibol at intel.com (Elibol, Oguz H) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:37:28 -0800 Subject: Innotec free at 20:30-22:30 today Message-ID: <88D294E28D20D84C9350E231A79B0E639EA240EA@orsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sgchong at stanford.edu Wed Dec 9 17:56:07 2009 From: sgchong at stanford.edu (Soogine Chong) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:56:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec free 10:30PM today(Wed) - 1AM tomorrow Message-ID: <1081422598.1125571260410167689.JavaMail.root@zm07.stanford.edu> Took a recently released reservation slot. -Soogine. From yiyangg at stanford.edu Thu Dec 10 19:21:14 2009 From: yiyangg at stanford.edu (Yiyang Gong) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:21:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: free starting now (7pm) Message-ID: <1699769307.1168561260501674049.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Done early. From jennyhu at stanford.edu Fri Dec 11 13:25:40 2009 From: jennyhu at stanford.edu (Jenny Hu) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:25:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec Free from 2 - 4:30 PM Today Message-ID: <753680338.1294251260566740933.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Sorry, unexpected problem with upstream equipment. Samples won't be ready in time. From jennyhu at stanford.edu Fri Dec 11 13:30:01 2009 From: jennyhu at stanford.edu (Jenny Hu) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:30:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec Free from 2 - 4:30 PM Today In-Reply-To: <753680338.1294251260566740933.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <909550506.1295001260567001072.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Unable to cancel the Coral reservation under raneeyoo, but go ahead and use the time. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jenny Hu" To: "Innotec" Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 1:25:40 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Innotec Free from 2 - 4:30 PM Today Sorry, unexpected problem with upstream equipment. Samples won't be ready in time. From sonnyvo at gmail.com Fri Dec 11 13:56:18 2009 From: sonnyvo at gmail.com (sonnyv) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:56:18 -0800 Subject: taken! : Innotec Free from 2 - 4:30 PM Today In-Reply-To: <909550506.1295001260567001072.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> References: <753680338.1294251260566740933.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> <909550506.1295001260567001072.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <001201ca7aac$c5f3e720$51dbb560$@com> Best Regards, Sonny ! __________________________________________________ "What makes the desert beautiful," said the Little Prince ,"is that somewhere it hides a well ." _.--. _ ;,- `' ( ,,, ( E#=====#############=: ] :_"' ,._( ``` `--' rock on Sonny Vo Ph.d candidate Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University (626) 202-8379 Harris Research Group: http://snow.stanford.edu/index.html -----Original Message----- From: Jenny Hu [mailto:jennyhu at stanford.edu] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 1:30 PM To: Innotec Subject: Re: Innotec Free from 2 - 4:30 PM Today Unable to cancel the Coral reservation under raneeyoo, but go ahead and use the time. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jenny Hu" To: "Innotec" Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 1:25:40 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Innotec Free from 2 - 4:30 PM Today Sorry, unexpected problem with upstream equipment. Samples won't be ready in time. From maurice at stanford.edu Fri Dec 11 16:28:52 2009 From: maurice at stanford.edu (maurice stevens) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:28:52 -0800 Subject: No gold Innotec source for the weekend Message-ID: <4B22E3C4.4000508@stanford.edu> Jeannie pushed the vendor hard but the gold source will not be ready for the weekend. The clean shutters have arrived and are in the lab. -- maurice at stanford.edu Maurice Stevens Stanford Nanofabrication Facility CIS Room 142, Mail Code 4070 Stanford, CA 94305 P. (650)725-3660 F. (650)725.6278 From klharris at stanford.edu Fri Dec 11 17:40:03 2009 From: klharris at stanford.edu (Kim Lake Harrison) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:40:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec free 7:30 to 11:30 tonight Message-ID: <1088536199.1161941260582003141.JavaMail.root@zm01.stanford.edu> My apologies, my samples are not ready. From sqliu at stanford.edu Sat Dec 12 09:18:29 2009 From: sqliu at stanford.edu (John Liu) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:18:29 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec free 11:30-2pm Message-ID: <1188653015.1400521260638309567.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Sample won't be ready. From jennyhu at stanford.edu Sat Dec 12 10:31:37 2009 From: jennyhu at stanford.edu (Jenny Hu) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:31:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec Free 8:30-11:30 PM Today In-Reply-To: <829777966.1404591260642637756.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <924909318.1404691260642697495.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Took an earlier slot. Sorry, unable to delete reservation with lwchang, so go ahead and use it. From lyjiao at stanford.edu Sun Dec 13 09:49:25 2009 From: lyjiao at stanford.edu (Liying Jiao) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec free 11:00am-2pm In-Reply-To: <1095330739.1765171260726268716.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <1041876003.1765521260726565301.JavaMail.root@zm08.stanford.edu> From mzi9890 at yahoo.com Sun Dec 13 12:07:46 2009 From: mzi9890 at yahoo.com (Mohammed Islam) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:07:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec free 3:30-5:30pm Today 12/13 Message-ID: <244977.44811.qm@web83508.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Samples not ready. Sorry for the late notice. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimkruger at yahoo.com Sun Dec 13 17:07:14 2009 From: jimkruger at yahoo.com (jim kruger) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:07:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec released Monday, 12-14-09 1500 to 1730 EOM Message-ID: <324886.35304.qm@web38904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From sgchong at stanford.edu Sun Dec 13 17:14:31 2009 From: sgchong at stanford.edu (Soogine Chong) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:14:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: innotec free Monday 10PM-midnight Message-ID: <350624301.1882491260753271408.JavaMail.root@zm07.stanford.edu> Took the recently released afternoon slot. From sqliu at stanford.edu Sun Dec 13 18:22:26 2009 From: sqliu at stanford.edu (John Liu) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:22:26 -0800 Subject: Innotec Free 2-4:30am Message-ID: <1379985FC1B44F9687FEE5072B286B01@PC> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimkruger at yahoo.com Tue Dec 15 07:37:08 2009 From: jimkruger at yahoo.com (jim kruger) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:37:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec released today, 12-15-09, 1100 to 1330 EOM Message-ID: <464262.25750.qm@web38907.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From rshyam at stanford.edu Tue Dec 15 19:30:28 2009 From: rshyam at stanford.edu (Shyam Raghunathan) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:30:28 -0800 Subject: innotec released 4.30 am to 6 am wednesday Message-ID: From sqliu at stanford.edu Wed Dec 16 02:07:04 2009 From: sqliu at stanford.edu (John Liu) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:07:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Innotec free 2-4:30am Message-ID: <1876278676.1934981260958024940.JavaMail.root@zm06.stanford.edu> Sorry for the late notice. Last processing step failed.