Allowed processes
Mark Wistey
wistey at snowmass.stanford.edu
Tue Oct 4 19:12:59 PDT 2005
There seems to be some confusion for new users of the PlasmaQuest as
to the usage of new processes on the machine. We apologize that the
old process policy apparently never make it to the PQuest Processes
web page, and apparently new trainees are not being made aware that
they need to get prior approval for any new process or recipe. The
policy can also be found in the PQuest mailing list archive (July
2003):
http://snf.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi/870
We will make sure the current operating policy is posted to the web
page, and included in PQuest training, and that SpecMat is aware of
the restrictions on the machine. If our more explicit policy (from
Mike's email last week) is approved, it will be posted as well.
Without further ado, here is the operating policy as of 2003:
>Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 09:55:29 -0700
>From: Jim McVittie <mcvittie at snf.stanford.edu>
>Organization: Stanford Nanofabrication Facility
>To: pquest at snf.stanford.edu
>Subject: Deleting Old Processes on PQuest
>
>PQuest Users,
>
>Thanks for senting me your PQuest processes. Now that I have all the
>current processes, I am going to start deleting all the old processes
>that are no longer being used. Any process that has not been sent to me
>by THIS FRIDAY ( 5pm July 11) will be considered a new process and will
>need to get my approval being able to be run on the PQuest. Only
>processes that I have recieved will be kept on the PQuest. Over the
>weekend, I will send out a list of all the current approved processes.
>Running unproved processes will be ground for being removed from the
>PQuest user list.
>
> Thanks, Jim McVittie
The form to request a new process OR recipe is here:
http://snf.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?870:mss:109:200307:fahiihjcobiobfcemdnn
And here's the start of the split by days of the week. As Seth
pointed out during today's meeting, setting aside Sun-Tues for
"dirty" silicon processes does not mean "any" silicon process. In
other words, even existing processes may be restricted in the future
if they are found to interfere with the primary purpose of the
machine (GaAs/AlGaAs etching), even if they're performed Sun-Tues.
>Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:36:26 -0700
>From: Jim McVittie <mcvittie at snf.stanford.edu>
>To: pquest at snf.stanford.edu
>Subject: PQuest Time Split
>
>Pquest Users,
>
>Here is where things stand on slitting the use of the Pquest over the
>week. We will start out with a 4/3 split and see how well it works. The
>III-V users will get Wed-Sat and other users will have
>Sun-Tues. Since it is already on Monday, I propose we start the III-V
>period on Thursday of this week with them only getting 3 days on their
>first period.
>
> Thanks, Jim McVittie
Jim McVittie also posted a nice summary of process separation from
Applied Materials. Today's meeting seemed to have some confusion
about the difference between polymerizing (low-oxygen) and
nonpolymerizing (high-oxygen) plasmas.
http://snf.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?870:mss:111:200307:milghaonmllgibblleie
I would encourage all users of the PQuest--particularly new users who
may not be aware of the machine's history--to read through the email
list archive from time to time. Sometimes new users run into a
problem which was identified and solved by another user years ago.
Or it may just be helpful to understand the reasoning behind the way
things are today.
- Mark
More information about the pquest
mailing list