PQuest update 1-12-09
jim kruger
jimkruger at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 12 11:57:13 PST 2009
Sorry to be so slow, my desk move has me even more disorganized than usual.
The Gate valve seems to work OK, I got about 1.1 mTorr/minute, slowing for long times to 1.0 (out to 28 minutes).
The chuck heater acts burned out. The read-out still works. The work-around is to use the chiller, setting about 3 degrees (or more for high power) below the desired chuck temp. and watch the temp. manually. By the way, I only just learned that setting the temp controller in "Manual" (indicator light on) results in fixed power to the heater, possibly burning it out. I found it in Manual.
The wafer clamp is now electrically isolated from ground, resulting in about higher voltages for the same recipe (about 42% for the recipes I have tried). Jim McVittie's input is that the RF is now more efficient so to reproduce the voltage of an old recipe, reduce the RF by about 40% (cut and try). This change will hopefully reduce RF current though the clamp springs and lengthen their life-time.
The five finger clamp is still in place so voltage always reads. The down-side of this clamp is that standard thickness wafers appear to be distorted a little, giving higher back-side He flows the the other clamp. I was getting about 8.4 sccm. The "no-wafer" flow is 11 so we have about a delta of 3 which is just OK, but not ideal. Best is a indicated flow of 3 sccm (3 is the zero offset).
I have found that thicker carrier wafers give a lower flow. With a 770 um wafer I get about 5.2 sccm this week. I have seen as low as 4.5 with thick wafers. If cooling is critical to an etch, consider getting thicker carrier wafers.
jimkruger
.
--- On Wed, 1/7/09, Thomas O'Sullivan <tdo at stanford.edu> wrote:
> From: Thomas O'Sullivan <tdo at stanford.edu>
> Subject: pquest gate valve
> To: "jim kruger" <jimkruger at yahoo.com>
> Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 10:02 PM
> Hi Jim,
> I heard John thought he solved the gate valve problem. Did
> you get a chance to a run a leak-up check?
>
> Thanks!
> Tom
More information about the pquest
mailing list