From grupp at snowmass.stanford.edu Fri Jul 1 16:20:26 2005 From: grupp at snowmass.stanford.edu (Dan Grupp) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:20:26 -0700 Subject: ZEP very resistant to AMT oxide etch! Message-ID: Want to share a great (and surprising!!) result: ZEP didn't etch in the AMT standrad oxide etch for 2.5 minutes, within resolution of dektak. The oxide etch performed normally. Rather odd, since nitride etch in P5000 is very fast: 3400A/min of ZEP at low power. Does everyone know this already? You're probably already using it to make fantastic devices... Happy 4th, Dan -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Daniel Grupp, Visiting Scholar Center for Integrated Systems Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 (650) 724-6911 FAX: 723-4659 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From mtopinka at stanford.edu Sat Jul 2 03:08:39 2005 From: mtopinka at stanford.edu (Mark Allen Topinka) Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 03:08:39 -0700 Subject: Raith: LEO Server Password needed. Message-ID: <1120298919.42c667a7a2e96@webmail.stanford.edu> Hi everyone- I ran into some problems during my write (annoying but hopefully non-serious, having to do with ELPHY Zoom-X and Zoom-Y screw-ups) and had to reboot the system. Unfortunately, now the LEO Server seems to be asking me for a username and password, and I have no idea what they are. Whoever is using the system next needs to have that password- call James on his cell-phone (it's too late at night for me to call him). 415-412-4825. Good luck. -Mark 650-387-6049 From zia at stanford.edu Sat Jul 2 20:45:21 2005 From: zia at stanford.edu (Rashid Zia) Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 20:45:21 -0700 Subject: Raith free from 3-5:30pm on Monday Message-ID: <200507030345.j633j30l027276@smtp-roam.Stanford.EDU> Hello, The slot before mine on Monday (July 4th) opened up, so I moved my reservation. There is now a free slot from 3-5:30pm on Monday. Cheers, Rashid. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From englund at stanford.edu Sat Jul 2 21:22:54 2005 From: englund at stanford.edu (Dirk Robert Englund) Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 21:22:54 -0700 Subject: MA-N 2403 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1120364574.42c7681e49c64@webmail.stanford.edu> Hi, Does someone know where the MA-N 2403 negative e-beam resist is stored? (sorry to spam the whole list but I can't find it..) Thanks! Dirk From scaccag at stanford.edu Sun Jul 3 12:53:14 2005 From: scaccag at stanford.edu (Luigi Scaccabarozzi) Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: raith status sunday Message-ID: Hi all, a few comments: 1) This morning I found the raith software frozen and I had to kill it and restart it. The previous user most probably exited the LEO software after unloading, without waiting for the raith software to end normally the unload procedure. Restarting this morning was enough, but you may easily get errors that can be cleared only by an administrator. 2) Teh problem that Dirk had with the logic was just due to the fact that the "beam" switch on the elphy was flipped down, reversing the logic. That switch must stay flipped up. it may have been flipped down accidentally by Dirk or another user, so be careful with that 3) This morning I had a EHT trip which shut down the gun. I was working at 10kV, and not even started imaging my sample. I was able to recover simply shutting down both computer and restarting. I'm writing right now and everything seemed ok. I'll write more if I encounter more problems or if the write is bad, otherwise you can assume the system if up and working. Gigi From okilic at stanford.edu Sun Jul 3 18:13:17 2005 From: okilic at stanford.edu (Onur Kilic) Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:13:17 -0700 Subject: [Raith] Done early. Free to use. Message-ID: <1120439597.42c88d2d13808@webmail.stanford.edu> From mtopinka at stanford.edu Mon Jul 4 01:46:05 2005 From: mtopinka at stanford.edu (Mark Topinka) Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 01:46:05 -0700 Subject: Raith: interesting (important?) discovery Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20050704013734.041245f0@mtopinka.pobox.stanford.edu> Hi- if anyone is continuing to have problems with part(s) of their pattern being blurry or not exposing at all, while the rest of it seems fine, please contact me asap. I think I've figured out a work-around, even though I still don't understand the underlying hardware problem. As best I can tell, this is not happening because of a leaky beam blanker. Rather, it seems that after a long time being blanked (like, between writefield moves), the beam is out of focus and/or low in beam current for the first roughly 0.01-0.1 seconds after being unblanked (+ or - a factor of ten, probably - I haven't measured it carefully, and it probably depends on lots of things). Short blankings, like between dots or objects within one writefield don't affect it, so after the initial "warm-up" time in each writefileld, my experience has been that the rest of the pattern writes great. The (hack) solution that I found is to make a sacrificial object in each writefield that takes about a second to write and is the first thing that gets written. (Use the "O" command in the raith pattern editor to order your objects so that it is the first object written, otherwise it does no good). I have no idea *why* the raith is doing this. Has anybody else continued to experience these problems (even after the column replacement?) or have I been the only one? -Mark From edo at stanford.edu Tue Jul 5 00:27:36 2005 From: edo at stanford.edu (Edo Waks) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 00:27:36 -0700 Subject: res. cancelled 1:00-9:00 am, sample not ready Message-ID: <000001c58133$0499a320$0200a8c0@DaShiznit> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Tue Jul 5 11:16:03 2005 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:16:03 -0700 Subject: Raith Micrograph Award 2005 -- Please consider submitting your best images! Message-ID: <42CACE63.101@snf.stanford.edu> Raith Users: You are encouraged to consider submitting your best images to RAITH. all the best, James W. Conway -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Raith Micrograph Award 2005 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:23:35 +0200 From: Eggert, Marc To: Dear customer, With regard to Raith?s first Micrograph Award in 2004 that attracted great interest, we are pleased to inform you that Raith arranges the 'MICROGRAPH AWARD 2005' for highly sophisticated scientific application within our customers community. We meanwhile have more than 300 customers world wide working successfully with our lithography products for research and development. We would like our users to share their results (selection of contributions from Raith Micrograph Award 2004 ) for much more efficient than before with us and with the global network we have established with other users. For this we are interested in state of the art application material for our application notes, user meetings and the image gallery of our website. Participants should submit one or more pictures showing nano structures which were created using a Raith electron beam lithography system (ELPHY or RAITH50, RAITH150). A brief overview about the scientific motivation shall be attached as well as your address details. We also accept pictures showing "accidents" as long as they are displaying a unique nano- or microstructure. All Raith electron beam system and Raith SEM attachment users can participate, except Raith staff members or Raith partners staff members. The deadline for submission is set to be November 1st, 2005. After that date a committee of the Raith application team will decide about the award and apply following criterion for the three most attractive micrographs: uniqueness of nano structure quality of image description of what can be seen Please open attached pdf file for registration or visit Raith website ( ) for further details ! We are looking forward to your transmittals -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: raith_micrograph_award_2005.pdf Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1168145 bytes Desc: not available URL: From zia at stanford.edu Tue Jul 5 11:21:43 2005 From: zia at stanford.edu (Rashid Zia) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:21:43 -0700 Subject: Raith Free, Tomorrow 9am-1pm Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20050705111955.00c26978@zia.pobox.stanford.edu> Hi Everyone, I cannot use my session tomorrow, Wednesday July 6th, from 9am -1pm, so I have removed my reservation. Apologies, Rashid. From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Tue Jul 5 12:15:51 2005 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:15:51 -0700 Subject: Raith: interesting (important?) discovery In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20050704013734.041245f0@mtopinka.pobox.stanford.edu> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20050704013734.041245f0@mtopinka.pobox.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <42CADC67.1000309@snf.stanford.edu> Hello mark and RAITH Users: This is the first report of this kind of problem. Has anyone else seen this type of problem? Please check your time delay settings to minimize dynamic effects: In the exposure control box check DETAILS. This is the time delay between stage moves and Write field to Write Field stitching moves between write fields. Best value is 5 ms (default), but it is user adjustable and it may have been changed in the specific users' login. Times greater than 3 ms have been found to expose correctly. Thank you, JWC Mark Topinka wrote: > Hi- if anyone is continuing to have problems with part(s) of their > pattern being blurry or not exposing at all, while the rest of it > seems fine, please contact me asap. I think I've figured out a > work-around, even though I still don't understand the underlying > hardware problem. As best I can tell, this is not happening because > of a leaky beam blanker. Rather, it seems that after a long time > being blanked (like, between writefield moves), the beam is out of > focus and/or low in beam current for the first roughly 0.01-0.1 > seconds after being unblanked (+ or - a factor of ten, probably - I > haven't measured it carefully, and it probably depends on lots of > things). Short blankings, like between dots or objects within one > writefield don't affect it, so after the initial "warm-up" time in > each writefileld, my experience has been that the rest of the pattern > writes great. The (hack) solution that I found is to make a > sacrificial object in each writefield that takes about a second to > write and is the first thing that gets written. (Use the "O" command > in the raith pattern editor to order your objects so that it is the > first object written, otherwise it does no good). I have no idea > *why* the raith is doing this. Has anybody else continued to > experience these problems (even after the column replacement?) or have > I been the only one? -Mark > From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Tue Jul 5 12:21:34 2005 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:21:34 -0700 Subject: Raith: LEO Server Password needed. In-Reply-To: <1120298919.42c667a7a2e96@webmail.stanford.edu> References: <1120298919.42c667a7a2e96@webmail.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <42CADDBE.3060903@snf.stanford.edu> Really EZ folks! Just put in your RAITH or LEO User name and password to log in -- simple as that! Windows user and passwd is: user as always! no panic just take deep breaths... JWC Mark Allen Topinka wrote: >Hi everyone- > I ran into some problems during my write (annoying but hopefully >non-serious, having to do with ELPHY Zoom-X and Zoom-Y screw-ups) and had >to reboot the system. Unfortunately, now the LEO Server seems to be asking >me for a username and password, and I have no idea what they are. Whoever >is using the system next needs to have that password- call James on his >cell-phone (it's too late at night for me to call him). 415-412-4825. >Good luck. -Mark 650-387-6049 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Tue Jul 5 17:41:39 2005 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:41:39 -0700 Subject: raith status sunday -- RE: RAITH EHT TRIP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <42CB28C3.4090009@snf.stanford.edu> Greetings Raith Users: RE: RAITH EHT TRIP encountered this last weekend. I checked out the gun and system vacuum levels before bringing the EHT up to 10 and then 20 kV. I did not see any problems with FE-Gun stability other than a slight change upwards in Gun Vacuum as the EHT was run up. Users were also working at 20 kV yesterday evening with no problems with arcing or EHT trips. Emission is stable. Gun vacuum is in the 2.0E-009 mbar area, slightly higher than I am targeting for. Users are requested to be kind and gentle to the computers during their raith operations. Please ensure that all exits from the software applications are performed gracefully and allowing time for the system to log and write out the data files to disk upon exit. Please do not CTRL-ALT-DELETE to exit either any of the SW applications or the WIN 2000 Pro OS. I just defragged these computers last week! Thank you for your support! James Conway Luigi Scaccabarozzi wrote: >Hi all, >a few comments: >1) This morning I found the raith software frozen and I had to kill it and >restart it. The previous user most probably exited the LEO software after >unloading, without waiting for the raith software to end normally the >unload procedure. Restarting this morning was enough, but you may easily >get errors that can be cleared only by an administrator. >2) Teh problem that Dirk had with the logic was just due to the fact that >the "beam" switch on the elphy was flipped down, reversing the logic. That >switch must stay flipped up. it may have been flipped down accidentally by >Dirk or another user, so be careful with that >3) This morning I had a EHT trip which shut down the gun. I was working at >10kV, and not even started imaging my sample. I was able to recover simply >shutting down both computer and restarting. >I'm writing right now and everything seemed ok. I'll write more if I >encounter more problems or if the write is bad, otherwise you can assume >the system if up and working. >Gigi > > From xinranw at gmail.com Thu Jul 7 07:23:33 2005 From: xinranw at gmail.com (Xinran Wang) Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 07:23:33 -0700 Subject: Raith Free to use from 1pm to 4:30 Message-ID: <22ffcd060507070723253111fd@mail.gmail.com> Sample is not ready, so cancel the reservation. Xinran -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Thu Jul 7 09:46:07 2005 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:46:07 -0700 Subject: Raith Free to use from 1pm to 4:30 In-Reply-To: <22ffcd060507070723253111fd@mail.gmail.com> References: <22ffcd060507070723253111fd@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <42CD5C4F.7070307@snf.stanford.edu> I will take the time that opened to catch up on many items ongoing characterizations. Thank you for the early notice! JWC Xinran Wang wrote: > Sample is not ready, so cancel the reservation. > > Xinran From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Thu Jul 7 09:51:30 2005 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:51:30 -0700 Subject: Please carefully inspect your patterns written since we came back up June 24, 2005 Message-ID: <42CD5D92.9080407@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cwhicks at stanford.edu Thu Jul 7 16:27:17 2005 From: cwhicks at stanford.edu (Clifford Hicks) Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 16:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Raith available 6-8am Friday 7/8 Message-ID: From mtopinka at stanford.edu Thu Jul 7 18:23:59 2005 From: mtopinka at stanford.edu (Mark Topinka) Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:23:59 -0700 Subject: Raith free 3:30am-5:00am tomorrow (Friday). In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20050707182250.044d13a8@mtopinka.pobox.stanford.edu> Thanks Cliff! I have moved my reservation to slightly later in the morning - raith is now free 3:30-5. -Mark At 04:27 PM 7/7/2005, Clifford Hicks wrote: From levi at snowmass.stanford.edu Sun Jul 10 21:19:43 2005 From: levi at snowmass.stanford.edu (Ofer Levi) Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:19:43 -0700 Subject: Raith available 9:30 PM till 2:00 AM Sunday night Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20050710211750.03bfed50@snow.stanford.edu> Hi All, I will need a long Raith write this time and someone booked at 2 AM after me, and I will not be able to complete it so I need to re-schedule to later date. Regards, Ofer From grupp at snowmass.Stanford.EDU Sun Jul 10 22:43:25 2005 From: grupp at snowmass.Stanford.EDU (Dan Grupp) Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: out sick monday, res removed raith (10-1300), ebeam (17-2200) Message-ID: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Daniel Grupp, Visiting Scholar Center for Integrated Systems Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 (650) 724-6911 FAX: 723-4659 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From kychen51 at yahoo.com Mon Jul 11 01:28:10 2005 From: kychen51 at yahoo.com (Kenneth Chen) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Raith Reserv 2am to 6am cancelled Message-ID: <20050711082810.18329.qmail@web51404.mail.yahoo.com> Previous user reports Loadlock Error 2. I cannot get around this problem either without administrator access. Reservation cancelled. - Kenneth Chen __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cwhicks at stanford.edu Mon Jul 11 13:53:19 2005 From: cwhicks at stanford.edu (Clifford Hicks) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:53:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Raith available today (7/11) 7-9pm Message-ID: I will not be able to make this session. From ifushman at stanford.edu Mon Jul 11 14:04:08 2005 From: ifushman at stanford.edu (Ilya Fushman) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:04:08 -0700 Subject: Raith available Wed (7/13) 12 am - 4 am References: Message-ID: <02cb01c5865c$14a3cec0$555540ab@BEHEMOTH> Moved session. From zia at stanford.edu Tue Jul 12 22:04:55 2005 From: zia at stanford.edu (Rashid Zia) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:04:55 -0700 Subject: Raith free tomorrow, Wednesday 1-5pm+ Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20050712220222.00c27f90@zia.pobox.stanford.edu> Hello Everyone, Sorry the late notice, but I do not need my time tomorrow (Wednesday) from 1-5pm. I have cancelled my reservation; hopefully someone will be able to use this time. Apologies, Rashid. From mtopinka at stanford.edu Thu Jul 14 15:13:01 2005 From: mtopinka at stanford.edu (Mark Topinka) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:13:01 -0700 Subject: RAITH: Saturday 12:30-3:00 open Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20050714151235.043e58c0@mtopinka.pobox.stanford.edu> From xinranw at gmail.com Fri Jul 15 17:10:32 2005 From: xinranw at gmail.com (Xinran Wang) Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:10:32 -0700 Subject: Finish session early, Raith free now Message-ID: <22ffcd060507151710659fc349@mail.gmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zia at stanford.edu Sat Jul 16 12:18:26 2005 From: zia at stanford.edu (Rashid Zia) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:18:26 -0700 Subject: Raith free Sunday 1-5pm Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20050716121719.00c288e0@zia.pobox.stanford.edu> Hello Everyone, My samples will not be ready for my session tomorrow, so I have removed my reservation between 1-5pm on Sunday. Apologies, Rashid. From ifushman at stanford.edu Sat Jul 16 12:37:57 2005 From: ifushman at stanford.edu (Ilya Fushman) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:37:57 -0700 Subject: Raith free Sunday 1-5pm References: <5.2.0.9.2.20050716121719.00c288e0@zia.pobox.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <054901c58a3d$de940d50$555540ab@BEHEMOTH> I am taking this. Thanks, Ilya ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rashid Zia" To: "Raith SNF Mailing list" Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 12:18 PM Subject: Raith free Sunday 1-5pm > Hello Everyone, > > My samples will not be ready for my session tomorrow, so I have removed my > reservation between 1-5pm on Sunday. > > Apologies, > Rashid. > > > From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Tue Jul 19 11:20:32 2005 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:20:32 -0700 Subject: [Fwd: Problem raith SNF 2005-07-18 13:15:36: EHT trip overnight SUNDAY brought gun down hard] Message-ID: <42DD4470.3040802@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ahazeghi at stanford.edu Tue Jul 19 16:00:45 2005 From: ahazeghi at stanford.edu (Arash Hazeghi) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:00:45 -0700 Subject: Reservation removed Message-ID: <24a1f0be1562d633777815180342efdf@stanford.edu> Reservation removed Thursday 3:00-7:30 AM From ifushman at stanford.edu Tue Jul 19 17:32:52 2005 From: ifushman at stanford.edu (Ilya Fushman) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:32:52 -0700 Subject: Reservation moved References: <24a1f0be1562d633777815180342efdf@stanford.edu> Message-ID: <03b701c58cc2$90af0360$555540ab@BEHEMOTH> Moved reservation from Fri night to Sat night. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arash Hazeghi" To: "raith" Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 4:00 PM Subject: Reservation removed > Reservation removed Thursday 3:00-7:30 AM > > From xinranw at gmail.com Wed Jul 20 11:16:16 2005 From: xinranw at gmail.com (Xinran Wang) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:16:16 -0700 Subject: reservation cancelled this afternoon from 2 to 6pm Message-ID: <22ffcd0605072011165a5054ee@mail.gmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From yamanaka at snowmass.stanford.edu Wed Jul 20 12:31:01 2005 From: yamanaka at snowmass.stanford.edu (Kazuhiko Yamanaka) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:31:01 -0700 Subject: reservation cancelled this afternoon from 2 to 6pm In-Reply-To: <22ffcd0605072011165a5054ee@mail.gmail.com> References: <22ffcd0605072011165a5054ee@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20050720123037.E58E.YAMANAKA@snowmass.stanford.edu> Thanks, I will take it. Kazuhiko ------- Kazuhiko Yamanaka Harris Group, Solid State & Photonics Lab, Center for Integrated Systems, Stanford University CIS-X Rm 126X, Stanford, CA 94305-4075 Tel : (650)725-6909 Fax: (650)723-4659 E-mail : yamanaka at snowmass.stanford.edu From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Fri Jul 22 14:18:48 2005 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James Conway) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:18:48 -0700 Subject: I will be away on FTO through August 1, 2005 Message-ID: <42E162B8.1090505@snf.stanford.edu> Greetings: I will be away from Stanford Nanofabrication Facility through 8:30 AM Monday August 1, 2005. I may be reachable by cell phone for emergencies only. 001-415-412-4825. Note I will be three hours behind you in time... I will not be able to respond to email at jwc at snf.stanford.edu In my absence Gigi, Mark Topinka, David Fattal and Ryan Tu will be in charge of the RAITH system. Please refer to your local Raith Champion should you need assistance on the system. If you run into problems or system issues please follow the 'Who are you going to Call' procedures posted by the system and attached to this email. Joe Klingfus with Raith USA will be available to answer application questions if you need it. Cole Loomis should be contacted at Raith USA should any system performance and maintenance issues. Thank you for your support! James Conway Stanford Nanofabrication Facility FAQ: HOW to get help on the RAITH System during your session -- "Who are your gonna call" >> >> FAQ ##: SYSTEM PROBLEMS: "WHO ARE YOU GOING TO CALL" >> >> >> Greetings: >> >> I will be away all of next week. I wish to remind everyone >> that we have set into place a hierarchical structure on what to do >> and whom to call if you encounter problems on the RAITH 150 system >> during my absence' or for those times I am not be available by cell >> phone. >> >> I will be available by phone at 415-412-4825 by voice mail and SMS >> text messaging. I will respond at my earliest opportunity. >> I normally will call the Ebeam Lab several times daily through the >> course of the week. >> >> >> For Example: >> >> * You encounter a LOAD LOCK Error 4 on the system and cannot >> complete the Load/ Unload cycle without an administrator login. >> * The pumps or system hardware are not working normally and the >> logic may have become reversed. >> * Beam Blanking Logic is reversed due to an RAITH150.exe >> application crash when the beam was unblanked... >> >> 1. If I am available, try to call me on my cell and I will walk >> you through the Recovery procedures. 001-415-412-4825 >> (NOTE: I live on the fringe of cell service when at home, and >> every Monday evening am off the grid after 10 PM and cannot be >> reached. Sometimes I can receive a SMS text messages. I will respond >> if I am able to ASAP. >> >> 2. Try to contact a RAITH Champion: >> Luigi Scaccabarozzi gigi at snf.stanford.edu at 1-650-725-6970 >> Arvind Sundaramurthy arvisun at stanford.edu 1-650- 450-0475 >> Ryan Tu ryantu at stanford.edu 1-650-799-6492 >> Mark Topinka mtopinka at stanford.edu 1-650-387-6049 >> David Fattal dfattal at stanford.edu 650-724-9612 office >> 650-723-8586 lab >> >> >> 3. Contact a RAITH USA Application Support Specialist: >> >> Dr. Joseph Klingfus, Applications Scientist jk at raithusa.com >> 218-483-1267 >> >> 4. For Major Hardware issues and all emergencies with the LEO or >> RAITH Hardware: >> Contact the RAITH USA Field Service Manager, Cole Loomis >> cl at raithusa.com (631) 738-9500 >> or Kevin Burcham also at the Main Raith USA line >> (631) 738-9500 >> >> Finally unless it is a catastrophic failure and the system becomes >> unsafe or in the least terrifying to operate -- please avoid placing >> the system into RED LIGHT Mode when I am away. ALWAYS report all >> errors and comments to to the CORAL 'Make Comments' or 'Report >> Problem' section so it gets logged into our tracking system. To quote >> John Shott, "Its not a problem until it is reported to CORAL." >> >> Many thanks to the many Raith Champions whom have come forward and >> offered to cover for me during my absence! >> >> Thank you all for your support! >> >> James Conway >> Ebeam Technology Group >> Stanford Nanofabrication Facility. >> 650-725-7075 >> cell 415-412-4825 >> jwc at snf.stanford.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: FAQ_PROBLEMS_Who_are_you_going_to_call.txt URL: From mtopinka at stanford.edu Sat Jul 23 19:44:40 2005 From: mtopinka at stanford.edu (Mark Allen Topinka) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:44:40 -0700 Subject: Raith free 3:30-5:30pm Sunday Message-ID: <1122173080.42e3009831a41@webmail.stanford.edu> I am not going to use all my time tomorrow- anybody want to jump on 3:30-5:30pm? Sorry for the short time block. From cwhicks at stanford.edu Mon Jul 25 09:59:43 2005 From: cwhicks at stanford.edu (Clifford Hicks) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Raith available 8-10am Tuesday 7/26 Message-ID: From cwhicks at stanford.edu Thu Jul 28 09:55:18 2005 From: cwhicks at stanford.edu (Clifford Hicks) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Raith available 7:30-11:30am Friday 7/29 Message-ID: Sample will not be ready From xinranw at gmail.com Fri Jul 29 12:43:52 2005 From: xinranw at gmail.com (Xinran Wang) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:43:52 -0700 Subject: Raith free this afternoon from 2 to 5 Message-ID: <22ffcd0605072912437e08ef94@mail.gmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: