From toecutter4ranger at gmail.com  Thu Dec  1 06:58:22 2011
From: toecutter4ranger at gmail.com (ToeCutter)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 06:58:22 -0800
Subject: no ZEP520A
In-Reply-To: <CAK8=9G562GsJypCdXgrAy+b_kintfwUAecAYUPjSATDH7_+J+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK8=9G562GsJypCdXgrAy+b_kintfwUAecAYUPjSATDH7_+J+w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FD651A6-AB13-4013-A107-857581D5D1A7@gmail.com>

There should be a new bottlen in the cleanroom! I just brought it in a  
week ago.

Users are reminded to ensure the ZEP520a material needs to be replaced  
to the refrigerator after dispensing onto your wafers or the material  
will hydrolyse and gel.

Did anyone use it or see it in the fab yesterday?

James

On Nov 30, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Kyeongran Yoo <raneeyoo at stanford.edu>  
wrote:

> can you please stock ZEP520A?
> thanks,
> kyeongran


From khu834 at stanford.edu  Thu Dec  1 08:48:49 2011
From: khu834 at stanford.edu (Kevin Chih-Yao Huang)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:48:49 -0800
Subject: no ZEP520A
In-Reply-To: <4FD651A6-AB13-4013-A107-857581D5D1A7@gmail.com>
References: <CAK8=9G562GsJypCdXgrAy+b_kintfwUAecAYUPjSATDH7_+J+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FD651A6-AB13-4013-A107-857581D5D1A7@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALda9zjd25MnMBZ1jg8m0nP9Sbj83mE9ucxXCjQZ1yZFOcX=AA@mail.gmail.com>

The ZEP520a is safely in the fridge.
I was using it just now.

Kevin

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:58 AM, ToeCutter <toecutter4ranger at gmail.com>wrote:

> There should be a new bottlen in the cleanroom! I just brought it in a
> week ago.
>
> Users are reminded to ensure the ZEP520a material needs to be replaced to
> the refrigerator after dispensing onto your wafers or the material will
> hydrolyse and gel.
>
> Did anyone use it or see it in the fab yesterday?
>
> James
>
> On Nov 30, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Kyeongran Yoo <raneeyoo at stanford.edu> wrote:
>
>  can you please stock ZEP520A?
>> thanks,
>> kyeongran
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/raith/attachments/20111201/1bdf40f5/attachment.html>

From khu834 at stanford.edu  Thu Dec  1 09:50:36 2011
From: khu834 at stanford.edu (Kevin Chih-Yao Huang)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:50:36 -0800
Subject: done early free till 11:30am
Message-ID: <CALda9ziz0pmUUx9pRTCBBG9SEXLWBbz0iqwuMG415+Kp4=tp_A@mail.gmail.com>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/raith/attachments/20111201/d8d93f7d/attachment.html>

From jwc at snf.stanford.edu  Thu Dec  1 15:24:25 2011
From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:24:25 -0800
Subject: PLEASE REMOVE ALL ENGINEERING MATERIALS, BINS, AND SAMPLES FROM THE
 EBEAM LAB AND ITS PASS THROUGH BY FRIDAY DECEMBER 9TH, 2011 FOR HOLIDAY SHUTDOWN...
Message-ID: <4ED80CA9.208@snf.stanford.edu>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/raith/attachments/20111201/0de347f0/attachment.html>

From mbaennin at stanford.edu  Sat Dec  3 15:33:22 2011
From: mbaennin at stanford.edu (Matthias Baenninger)
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 15:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Raith Released Tomorrow 5-8pm
Message-ID: <592333502.105346.1322955202240.JavaMail.root@zm04.stanford.edu>



From tasyurek at stanford.edu  Sun Dec  4 15:03:35 2011
From: tasyurek at stanford.edu (Emel Tasyurek)
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Raith free now till 4pm
Message-ID: <669000638.92378.1323039815294.JavaMail.root@zm02.stanford.edu>

finished early


From jwc at snf.stanford.edu  Mon Dec  5 12:16:51 2011
From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway)
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:16:51 -0800
Subject: Comment raith SNF 2011-12-03 16:40:20: Update on External Scan
 Control
Message-ID: <4EDD26B3.8090007@snf.stanford.edu>

Kevin,

Thanks for this observation.  I will continue to test to see what trips 
this.

It shouldn't matter either way as multiple hand shakes in communications 
occur before I get to the writing part of the sequence.

If other Users are seeing the horizontal streaks in their patterning, 
missing patterns or strange exposure artifacts resulting from external 
scan control not switching during your patterning -- please report back 
to this list.  I am tracking all exposure errors on the system.  I think 
it is only a rare intermittent problem at this point....

James

On 12/3/2011 4:40 PM, khu834 at snf.stanford.edu wrote:
> It seems that this problem only occurs when lauching Raith first, followed by the SmartSEM.
> If you open SmartSEM, then Raith, everything functions as normal
>


From sgchong at stanford.edu  Mon Dec  5 20:09:08 2011
From: sgchong at stanford.edu (Soogine Chong)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 20:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: raith free 12/8 5-7:30AM
Message-ID: <956211576.579096.1323144548378.JavaMail.root@zm07.stanford.edu>

Shortened my reservation.

-- 
Soogine Chong
Stanford University
PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering
e-mail: sgchong at stanford.edu
mobile: +1-650-804-8556



From janp at stanford.edu  Mon Dec  5 22:36:51 2011
From: janp at stanford.edu (Jan Petykiewicz)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:36:51 -0800
Subject: Raith free now -- finished early <eom>
Message-ID: <CAEOdNiGYX-dAtfy3jusiDnnMo+0N9kXmgXCUK5+95BStbp2tGg@mail.gmail.com>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/raith/attachments/20111205/aca6781b/attachment.html>

From janp at stanford.edu  Mon Dec  5 22:41:08 2011
From: janp at stanford.edu (Jan Petykiewicz)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:41:08 -0800
Subject: Comment raith SNF 2011-12-03 16:40:20: Update on External Scan Control
In-Reply-To: <4EDD26B3.8090007@snf.stanford.edu>
References: <4EDD26B3.8090007@snf.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <CAEOdNiHV6C7_Fp4-KkKaRysiRuhFQVnGTDWh6eobu=gSKEHNcw@mail.gmail.com>

I launched Raith first, SmartSEM second and had to manually switch over to
external control during writefield alignment.

-Jan

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:16, James W. Conway <jwc at snf.stanford.edu> wrote:

> Kevin,
>
> Thanks for this observation.  I will continue to test to see what trips
> this.
>
> It shouldn't matter either way as multiple hand shakes in communications
> occur before I get to the writing part of the sequence.
>
> If other Users are seeing the horizontal streaks in their patterning,
> missing patterns or strange exposure artifacts resulting from external scan
> control not switching during your patterning -- please report back to this
> list.  I am tracking all exposure errors on the system.  I think it is only
> a rare intermittent problem at this point....
>
> James
>
> On 12/3/2011 4:40 PM, khu834 at snf.stanford.edu wrote:
>
>> It seems that this problem only occurs when lauching Raith first,
>> followed by the SmartSEM.
>> If you open SmartSEM, then Raith, everything functions as normal
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/raith/attachments/20111205/223be88a/attachment.html>

From jwc at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Dec  7 16:28:08 2011
From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway)
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:28:08 -0800
Subject: Last Chance to complete your urgent EBL Writes -- Released my reservation
 for RAITH Field service for 24 hours period Thursday 10 AM until Friday 10
 AM.
Message-ID: <4EE00498.2030500@snf.stanford.edu>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/raith/attachments/20111207/d58d2749/attachment.html>

From jwc at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Dec  7 17:33:33 2011
From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway)
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:33:33 -0800
Subject: Fwd: Raith INFO 31, wall calendar, and Micrograph Award contest
In-Reply-To: <md5:oU5qIUP6cKbCQlGGqgG4pw==>
References: <md5:oU5qIUP6cKbCQlGGqgG4pw==>
Message-ID: <4EE013ED.1040305@snf.stanford.edu>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/raith/attachments/20111207/d186d190/attachment.html>

From jwc at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Dec  7 18:19:40 2011
From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway)
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:19:40 -0800
Subject: Comment raith SNF 2011-12-03 16:40:20: Update on External Scan
 Control
In-Reply-To: <000901ccb3b9$6c0d62c0$44282840$@cantab.net>
References: <4EDD26B3.8090007@snf.stanford.edu> <000901ccb3b9$6c0d62c0$44282840$@cantab.net>
Message-ID: <4EE01EBC.2000804@snf.stanford.edu>

OK Thanks everyone for your reports!

I spoke with Kevin Burcham yesterday during my conference call and he 
indicated that it should not matter either way -- but that most systems 
have reverted to launching the SMARTSEM first before the RAITH 
application launch.

EVERYONE USING RAITH 150:

Let change the start-up procedure to start with the launch of the 
SMARTSEM package, log in on the SMARTSEM client, and then launch the 
RAITH 150 application. Same as we used to do.

I will be testing this when I am next on the tool and with user sessions 
tomorrow before shutdown.

Thank you

James

On 12/5/2011 5:50 PM, Matthias Baenninger wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I had that problem with the SEM not switching to external control again
> during my write on Friday. I used the same order of starting up as Kevin
> describes, i.e. I started Raith150 and the SmartSEM. When switching to
> external control manually, everything worked fine.
>
> Matthias
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James W. Conway [mailto:jwc at snf.stanford.edu]
> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 12:17 PM
> To: khu834 at snf.stanford.edu; Ebeam Lab
> Subject: Re: Comment raith SNF 2011-12-03 16:40:20: Update on External Scan
> Control
>
> Kevin,
>
> Thanks for this observation.  I will continue to test to see what trips
> this.
>
> It shouldn't matter either way as multiple hand shakes in communications
> occur before I get to the writing part of the sequence.
>
> If other Users are seeing the horizontal streaks in their patterning,
> missing patterns or strange exposure artifacts resulting from external scan
> control not switching during your patterning -- please report back to this
> list.  I am tracking all exposure errors on the system.  I think it is only
> a rare intermittent problem at this point....
>
> James
>
> On 12/3/2011 4:40 PM, khu834 at snf.stanford.edu wrote:
>> It seems that this problem only occurs when lauching Raith first, followed
> by the SmartSEM.
>> If you open SmartSEM, then Raith, everything functions as normal
>>


From dlee76 at stanford.edu  Thu Dec  8 11:53:33 2011
From: dlee76 at stanford.edu (Donkoun Lee)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:53:33 -0800
Subject: Release my reservation from 13:00 to 16:00
Message-ID: <430DFABA-D78E-4770-9242-FA6FD8243B52@stanford.edu>

Hi all:

Yesterday, as soon as when I got an email from james, I prepared the samples for the Raith. However, the samples have a lot of defect due to the sudden preparation.
So, I need to release my reservation afternoon session. 

Sorry for the late notice.
Donkoun Lee

From khu834 at stanford.edu  Thu Dec  8 11:56:35 2011
From: khu834 at stanford.edu (Kevin Chih-Yao Huang)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:56:35 -0800
Subject: Release my reservation from 13:00 to 16:00
In-Reply-To: <430DFABA-D78E-4770-9242-FA6FD8243B52@stanford.edu>
References: <430DFABA-D78E-4770-9242-FA6FD8243B52@stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <CALda9zguApG1g8QYo+8uTs+yV5vC+FukqRAz7GavhdLm07gbRA@mail.gmail.com>

Took 2pm-4:30pm.
Thank you.


On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Donkoun Lee <dlee76 at stanford.edu> wrote:

> Hi all:
>
> Yesterday, as soon as when I got an email from james, I prepared the
> samples for the Raith. However, the samples have a lot of defect due to the
> sudden preparation.
> So, I need to release my reservation afternoon session.
>
> Sorry for the late notice.
> Donkoun Lee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/raith/attachments/20111208/b5c70ce0/attachment.html>

From chalabi at stanford.edu  Thu Dec  8 20:40:48 2011
From: chalabi at stanford.edu (Hamidreza Chalabi)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Raith free now till 11:00pm
In-Reply-To: <584256403.256673.1323404135968.JavaMail.root@zm02.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <621029840.257183.1323405648531.JavaMail.root@zm02.stanford.edu>

finished early


From toecutter4ranger at gmail.com  Wed Dec 14 20:52:29 2011
From: toecutter4ranger at gmail.com (ToeCutter)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:52:29 -0800
Subject: The Ebeam Lab is closed. No access until Feb for students 
Message-ID: <9F512E4C-E188-4D9A-A733-424128D67932@gmail.com>




From toecutter4ranger at gmail.com  Wed Dec 14 21:05:07 2011
From: toecutter4ranger at gmail.com (ToeCutter)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:05:07 -0800
Subject: The Ebeam Lab is closed no access until February
Message-ID: <35918AF5-00B7-4BDB-9297-F0484C5AD23D@gmail.com>

Good Evening
The Ebeam Lab is now closed to students and in the morning we hand off  
the entire SNF cleanroom to the Contractors.
Much fun was had tearing down the lab today. Everything has been  
mothballed or put away into storage.
Many thanks to those whom assisted the teardown and for removing all  
of your engineering materials just in time.

We will return in Late January and Users should expect to return to SNF
In February. Stay tuned for updates.
I look forward to building out a new improved layout in the Ebeam Lab  
during February and welcome your inputs.
Thank you for your support.
Happy Holidays,

James Conway