From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Fri Jan 11 10:59:57 2013 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:59:57 -0800 Subject: [raith] Fwd: Raith INFO 33 and Season's Greetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50F0612D.5040604@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From janp at stanford.edu Wed Jan 16 16:05:47 2013 From: janp at stanford.edu (Jan Petykiewicz) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:05:47 -0800 Subject: [raith] raith free 4-5:30, finished early Message-ID: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Fri Jan 18 10:27:48 2013 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:27:48 -0800 Subject: [raith] ANNOUNCEMENT: Raith Group 54- Four Day Short Course for Basic RAITH 150 Users Tuesday to Friday January 22 to 25th 10 AM to 6 PM Message-ID: <50F99424.4030300@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From justinwu at stanford.edu Fri Jan 25 11:32:48 2013 From: justinwu at stanford.edu (Justin Zachary Wu) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:32:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: [raith] Raith free 4pm- today In-Reply-To: <1827006622.5855135.1359142298701.JavaMail.root@stanford.edu> Message-ID: <1473517510.5857008.1359142368575.JavaMail.root@stanford.edu> Sorry for the late notice, sample turned out bad. From toecutter4ranger at gmail.com Fri Jan 25 23:13:02 2013 From: toecutter4ranger at gmail.com (ToeCutter) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:13:02 -0800 Subject: [raith] Raith is not shutdown just a badger issue Message-ID: <42A88ED6-1075-4A95-B7AF-8A9D91FABAFC@gmail.com> Good evening A new Raith and badger user in the tool this evening inadvertently selected shutdown instead of disable at the end of his session. Please disregard the badger shutdown notice and I will try to clear the red status once I can get connected online. The Raith system is working well and available to all Users From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Mon Jan 28 12:42:21 2013 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:42:21 -0800 Subject: [raith] Raith can be enabled now. I cleared the shut down message on Badger -- RAITH IS UP FOR USERS Message-ID: <5106E2AD.1030801@snf.stanford.edu> Greetings, Late Friday night a new User selected 'shut down' on the RAITH system message on the Badger by mistake. There was no problem with the tool. I was not able to clear this error remotely until I arrived at SNF. Users whom may have accessed the system over the weekend need only send me an email with the start and finished times /dates and I would be happy to adjust the charges. Thank you, James From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Mon Jan 28 15:32:13 2013 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:32:13 -0800 Subject: [raith] Special Presentation: "Single Digit Nanofabrication for Nanoscience" Dr. Deirdre Olynick, UC Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley Labs and Molecular Foundry Thursday Jan 31, 2013 12:00 - 1:30 PM. Message-ID: <51070A7D.5000603@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OLYNICK01312013_abstract.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 12938 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ofaolain at stanford.edu Tue Jan 29 13:30:24 2013 From: ofaolain at stanford.edu (Liam O'Faolain) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:30:24 -0800 Subject: [raith] Released 8.30am to 10.30am on Wednesday Message-ID: <51083F70.1040805@stanford.edu> Sample will not be ready -- Dr. William Whelan-Curtin (Liam O'Faolain) Ginzton Laboratory, Nano Building 348 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford CA 94305, USA. http://www.nanophotonics.eu From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Wed Jan 30 09:44:50 2013 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:44:50 -0800 Subject: [raith] New Thread NAME: FAQ NO XXX Setting larger write fields was ----> Re: 200um writefield In-Reply-To: <510016B0.3000100@stanford.edu> References: <510016B0.3000100@stanford.edu> Message-ID: <51095C12.7090008@snf.stanford.edu> I thought I covered this with you.... 200 um square WF and down use the high precision scan amplifier (No 2) which has tighter DAC binning than the higher current amplifier for larger write field sizes. minimum step will be 3.2 nm but normally you would set to 4 nm to fill completely your pattern dimensions. You will need to set up in scan manager write field alignment files for these scan areas. 50 um scan area with 60 um mark placement manually. 10 um and 2 um scan areas for subsequent WF alignments with auto placement button selected. I would also suggest setting up a column control file saving your alignment settings and associating the 500 X Mag., 200 um WF settings to this file. After you align the write field the initial time save to your write field control settings for the next time... hint: you can copy some of the lines from my scan.ini text file on the system if you don't have 200 um WF already set up. Please let me know if you have any questions. On 1/23/2013 8:58 AM, Liam O'Faolain wrote: > Hi James, > > I am planning to use the 200um WF in my next exposure. What are the > best conditions to use? Are there any differences with the 100um WF? I > believe that it uses a different amplifier range. > > Yours, > Will > From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Thu Jan 31 09:16:04 2013 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:16:04 -0800 Subject: [raith] REMINDER: Special Presentation: "Single Digit Nanofabrication for Nanoscience" Dr. Deirdre Olynick, UC Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley Labs and Molecular Foundry TODAY ALLEN X 101 12:00 - 1:30 PM. Message-ID: <510AA6D4.1070901@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OLYNICK01312013_abstract.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 12938 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ labmembers mailing list labmembers at snf.stanford.edu http://snf.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/labmembers From jwc at snf.stanford.edu Thu Jan 31 19:18:45 2013 From: jwc at snf.stanford.edu (James W. Conway) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:18:45 -0800 Subject: [raith] Fwd: EIPBN 2013: ABSTRACT SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENDED Help us spread the word ... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <510B3415.9090601@snf.stanford.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: