chemical approval

Ed Myers edmyers at stanford.edu
Wed Nov 14 13:24:39 PST 2007


All,

The P!-2610 and T-9036 might be OK (NMP based, if I understand the 
language).  The MSDS for both the VM-651 and VM-652 seem more 
concerning.  The VM-652 is 1-Methoxy-2-Propanol.  This reads pretty 
bad, but I don't know if anyone has any experience.

There is no information on the VM-651 as what are it's 
components.  The MSDS also reads pretty bad, so I think we should say 
no to this chemical.

Comments,
Ed


At 11:27 AM 11/14/2007, Elizabeth Edwards wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I don't know who to send these MSDS forms to for approval. I would
>like to purchase at least the PI-2610 to use in the Stanford
>NanoFacility (in CIS). If you are the right person - can you please
>let me know which of these chemicals (I've attached the MSDS sheets) I
>can purchase?
>
>Thanks,
>Liz
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Elizabeth Edwards <ehe at stanford.edu>
>Date: Nov 5, 2007 3:32 PM
>Subject: HD Microsystems polyimide MSDS
>To: Mary Tang <mtang at stanford.edu>
>
>
>Hi Mary,
>
>I wanted to check with you before purchasing these 4 chemicals that
>they are permitted inside SNF.
>
>MSDS attached for HD Microsystems products:
>PI-2610 polyimide
>T-9039 polyimide thinner
>VM-651 and VM-652 (one is concentrated) adhesion promoters
>
>-Liz
>
>Content-Type: application/pdf; name="PI-2610 MSDS.pdf"
>X-Attachment-Id: 0.2
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="PI-2610 MSDS.pdf"
>
>Content-Type: application/pdf; name="T-9039 MSDS.pdf"
>X-Attachment-Id: 0.3
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="T-9039 MSDS.pdf"
>
>Content-Type: application/pdf; name="VM-651 MSDS.pdf"
>X-Attachment-Id: 0.4
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="VM-651 MSDS.pdf"
>
>Content-Type: application/pdf; name="VM-652 MSDS.pdf"
>X-Attachment-Id: 0.5
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="VM-652 MSDS.pdf"





More information about the specmat mailing list