HgCdTe or mercury cadmium telluride
edmyers at stanford.edu
Wed Feb 4 13:47:14 PST 2009
We also have had verey negative experiences with ZnSe. On the other
hand there was some successful work on MgF2
At 01:26 PM 2/4/2009, John Shott wrote:
>Dmitry et al:
>I think that we need to know a heck of a lot more about what you
>propose to do with this stuff. I've never worked with HgCdTe
>directly but had some professional contact in my dim, dark past with
>people that were using HgCdTe for IR detectors. My recollection
>(which, admittedly, may be bad ....) was that a photoresist bake at
>90 deg C had to be taken into consideration because of the potential
>volatility of Hg. I seem to recall that they also relied on ultra
>low temperature .... that is, nearly room temperature,
>photo-activated deposition processes because 300 degree PECVD was too hot.
>So we need to know specifically what you think you need to do
>because we simply don't have the resources (personnel or equipment)
>to generate a subset of tools that are potentially mercury contaminated.
>Jim McVittie is out this week but, as I recall, in his dim, dark
>past he used to work with a number of exotic II-VI materials and may
>be able to shed more light on this matter. I don't expect that he
>will be in, however, until the first of next week.
More information about the specmat