[Fwd: Fwd: FW: GDMS results]

Mary Tang mtang at stanford.edu
Fri May 29 11:47:05 PDT 2009

Hi all --

I got some clarification from Aleta.  She says this is GDMS analysis on 
the starting materials only, but that they can run the same analysis on 
their deposited MBE films,  if we agree this type of analysis provides 
sufficient confidence that a "good" result will qualify this as 
acceptable as "clean" material. 

So, should we go ahead and ask them to get GDMS done on their deposited 
film to qualify for clean processing at SNF?


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Fwd: FW: GDMS results
Date: 	Thu, 28 May 2009 17:29:07 -0700
From: 	Aleta Jamora <artyjamo at gmail.com>
To: 	Mary Tang <mtang at stanford.edu>
<AD77C2DFAF33994E83AA9AAF3DB4FD951265CD at server01.xlucent.local>

Hi Mary,
   We have had some GDMS analysis on our films and the results are 
attached to this e-mail.  I am sending this as an example, we will/can 
get another GDMS done if the data in this result looks okay to you.
I  will write up the Spec Mat request as soon as we know (and get) what 
kind of contamination analysis data will be acceptable for Spec Mat review.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Sewell
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:12 PM
To: Aleta Jamora
Subject: GDMS results

Richard Sewell

Director of Technology, Translucent Inc
952 Commercial Street Palo Alto CA 94303
e-mail richard at translucentinc.com <mailto:richard at translucentinc.com>
Tel 650-213-9311 x225
Fax 650-213-9511
Cell 650-644-8700

Mary X. Tang, Ph.D.
Stanford Nanofabrication Facility
CIS Room 136, Mail Code 4070
Stanford, CA  94305
mtang at stanford.edu

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GDMS results .xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 19456 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/specmat/attachments/20090529/ebd9a1ba/attachment.xls>

More information about the specmat mailing list