From caudillomalik at netscape.net Mon Jul 2 14:53:21 2001 From: caudillomalik at netscape.net (David Caudillo) Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 17:53:21 -0400 Subject: stsetcher cancellation 7-3_1830 to midnite Message-ID: <60219A2C.44A009DD.0DC3DFDB@netscape.net> stsetcher cancellation on July 3rd from 18:30 to 00:00 (midnight). -- David Caudillo __________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ From sjlee at snf.stanford.edu Mon Jul 2 15:09:39 2001 From: sjlee at snf.stanford.edu (sjlee at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:09:39 -0700 Subject: stsetcher cancellation 7-3_1830 to midnite References: <60219A2C.44A009DD.0DC3DFDB@netscape.net> Message-ID: I just took the 8-midnight portion of what has been released tomorrow (7/3). Looks like someone has released time this evening, 7-midnight in case anyone is interested. -John ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Caudillo" To: Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 2:53 PM Subject: stsetcher cancellation 7-3_1830 to midnite stsetcher cancellation on July 3rd from 18:30 to 00:00 (midnight). -- David Caudillo From caudillomalik at netscape.net Thu Jul 5 17:35:01 2001 From: caudillomalik at netscape.net (David Caudillo) Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 20:35:01 -0400 Subject: stsetch cancellation 7-5 Message-ID: <3EF42476.74BB675F.0DC3DFDB@netscape.net> I'm unable to view coral, must give up my reservation. -- David Caudillo __________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ From pierre_indermuhle at yahoo.com Thu Jul 5 19:02:03 2001 From: pierre_indermuhle at yahoo.com (Pierre Indermuhle) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 19:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: stsetch cancellation 7-5 In-Reply-To: <3EF42476.74BB675F.0DC3DFDB@netscape.net> Message-ID: <20010706020203.77511.qmail@web12906.mail.yahoo.com> I'll take it until midnight Pierre --- David Caudillo wrote: > I'm unable to view coral, must give up my > reservation. > -- > David Caudillo > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account > today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ From vossough at snf.stanford.edu Mon Jul 9 19:07:44 2001 From: vossough at snf.stanford.edu (Kris Vossough) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 19:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: STS available now til 9:00pm Message-ID: Finished early. --KV From vik at stanford.edu Mon Jul 9 19:14:08 2001 From: vik at stanford.edu (Vikram Bala) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 19:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: STS available now til 9:00pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I'll use the time. thanks vik On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Kris Vossough wrote: > > Finished early. > --KV > > > > From hphan at snf.stanford.edu Wed Jul 11 09:53:11 2001 From: hphan at snf.stanford.edu (Henry Phan) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:53:11 -0700 Subject: open time Message-ID: <3B4C8477.AB72D3AF@snf.stanford.edu> Hi All, We will not use the STS today from 10-1:30. If anyone want to use it, you are welcome to take that time. Henry From svargo at siwaveinc.com Fri Jul 13 17:09:16 2001 From: svargo at siwaveinc.com (Stephen Vargo) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Etch time open on Sat. Message-ID: Sorry for the late notice but I will not have wafers ready for the 9am-2pm time slot on Saturday 7-14-01. It is now open. I will still be using the Sunday time slot from 9am-2pm. Steve From lian at Stanford.EDU Fri Jul 13 18:17:16 2001 From: lian at Stanford.EDU (Lian Zhang) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Etch time open on Sat. In-Reply-To: from "Stephen Vargo" at Jul 13, 2001 05:09:16 PM Message-ID: <200107140117.f6E1HGX22210@epic1.Stanford.EDU> I will take 11:30am-2pm. Thanks! Lian > > Sorry for the late notice but I will not have wafers ready for the 9am-2pm > time slot on Saturday 7-14-01. It is now open. > > I will still be using the Sunday time slot from 9am-2pm. > > Steve > > > From mbartsch at Stanford.EDU Sat Jul 14 11:22:45 2001 From: mbartsch at Stanford.EDU (Michael S. Bartsch) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: STS Problem Message-ID: <200107141822.f6EIMjT00095@myth5.Stanford.EDU> The STS appears to be down..."trying to re-establish communication link". Another user's wafer is stuck in the chamber. If the system becomes inoperable, please file a problem report or shutdown notice in Coral so other users will be able to see its status and plan accordingly. This also alerts maintenance staff to the problem. Leaving a note on the machine is fine, but please follow it up with an online problem report in Coral. Thanks, Mike From lmiller at siwaveinc.com Sun Jul 15 10:28:11 2001 From: lmiller at siwaveinc.com (Linda Miller) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 10:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Please help: Sunday 10:00 am Message-ID: I have signed up for the STS from 9-2 today, Sunday, July 15. Unfortunately, the system has a wafer locked in the chmaber and the turbo is down. Could one of the super-users stop in this morning to give me a hand. I flew up from LA this morning just to use this system, so I'm desperate to get it running. Please call me at 725-3681. If i am not here, I am off trying to locate someone to help, please stop by anyway. Thanks! Linda Miller. SiWave, inc. From aaronp at stanford.edu Sun Jul 15 10:28:37 2001 From: aaronp at stanford.edu (Aaron Partridge) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 10:28:37 -0700 Subject: Please help: Sunday 10:00 am In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: i got it -- aaron. At 10:28 AM -0700 7/15/01, Linda Miller wrote: >I have signed up for the STS from 9-2 today, Sunday, July 15. >Unfortunately, the system has a wafer locked in the chmaber and the turbo >is down. Could one of the super-users stop in this morning to give me a >hand. I flew up from LA this morning just to use this system, so I'm >desperate to get it running. Please call me at 725-3681. If i am not >here, I am off trying to locate someone to help, please stop by anyway. > >Thanks! >Linda Miller. SiWave, inc. From lmiller at siwaveinc.com Sun Jul 15 10:35:05 2001 From: lmiller at siwaveinc.com (Linda Miller) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 10:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Aaron has garciously agreed to come in-thanks Message-ID: Hi All, Aaron Partridge has graciously agreed to come in to help with the STS. Thanks anyway! Linda Miller From sjlee at snf.stanford.edu Thu Jul 19 11:47:29 2001 From: sjlee at snf.stanford.edu (sjlee at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:47:29 -0700 Subject: stsetch reservation released Fri 7/20 7AM-10AM Message-ID: From mbartsch at Stanford.EDU Thu Jul 19 12:50:18 2001 From: mbartsch at Stanford.EDU (Michael S. Bartsch) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Res removed, Sat 10am-12:30 Message-ID: <200107191950.f6JJoIm26169@elaine12.Stanford.EDU> From erictao at stanford.edu Fri Jul 20 04:02:27 2001 From: erictao at stanford.edu (Eric Tao) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 04:02:27 -0700 Subject: STS down In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4.3.1.2.20010720035937.00bbbb80@erictonn.pobox.stanford.edu> I tried to activate the door between chamber and loading area by pushing the red bottom on the back side of STS. After several rounds, it didn't work and just kept venting without stop(pressure is changed very slowly). Anyone can fix it so that it won't hurt too many people who made reservation today? Thanks! -eric From latta at snf.stanford.edu Fri Jul 20 11:05:21 2001 From: latta at snf.stanford.edu (Nancy Latta) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:05:21 -0700 Subject: Recent problems and a way around them. Message-ID: <3B5872E1.EE78BB4@snf.stanford.edu> Folks, First, do not attempt to take the machine out of a locked-up condition unless you are a specially trained advanced user. There are only two of them; Beth Pruitt and Aaron Partridge. Any attempts by untrained users may result in very serious damage to the etcher, including the possiblity of ruining the $30K turbo pump. As many of you know, we have been experienceing some very frustrating problems with the etcher. The major error message that we have seen is along the lines of 'clamp time exceeded'. Once this error is achieved the machine is fully locked up and will need an advanced user to re-boot it. What follows is a method by which we may keep the machine operational. It requires careful observation on your part as you use the system. If you feel you cannot keep a close watch on your run, please cancel your reservation. The problem seems to be that the slit valve between the laocdlock and chamber will not close after a wafer is loaded into the chamber. When loading, watch the graphic representation on the PC screen. After the wafer is placed on the chuck in the chamber the transfer arm withdraws. Once it has cleared the slit valve there is about a 4-5 second pause before the valve closes. It makes a 'cheeesck' sound. If that sound does not occur follow this procedure. You have about 10 secs to start before the error message shows and you'll need an advanced user to make the machine right again. 1. Abort the tranfer by clicking on abort in the tranfer window on the PC screen. This should close the slit valve. 2. Unload your wafer. 3. Load your wafer again. This time the valve should close and life will be good again. Again, if you feel this procedure is too much to follow, or if you think that you will not be able to pay close attention to your work, please cancel your reservation and wait until we get this sorted out. Nancy From eap at gloworm.Stanford.EDU Sat Jul 21 17:39:29 2001 From: eap at gloworm.Stanford.EDU (Eric Perozziello) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 17:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: some free time. Message-ID: <200107220039.RAA28206@gloworm.Stanford.EDU> I will have some free time opening up later today (sat) and tomorrow (sunday). If anyone needs the time, grab some. I had a particular problem I am trying to solve- My resist disappeared faster than normal. It may be a chuck cooling issue on the machine, so beware. -Eric From mbartsch at Stanford.EDU Sat Jul 21 17:56:06 2001 From: mbartsch at Stanford.EDU (Michael S. Bartsch) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 17:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: some free time. In-Reply-To: <200107220039.RAA28206@gloworm.Stanford.EDU> from "Eric Perozziello" at Jul 21, 2001 05:39:29 PM Message-ID: <200107220056.f6M0u6703561@elaine31.Stanford.EDU> Hi Eric, I had a similar problem last night -- in my case, 10um of SPR220 completely wiped out after only 2 hours of etching. I didn't write it up as a problem because I thought my new masks might just have had more open area than I was accustomed to working with. I experienced the problem both with and without the wafer holder on my long etches... If anyone else experiences the same problem, please pass it along to the list. Maybe one of our "advanced users" (Aaron?) can make a diagnosis. Thanks, Mike > > > I will have some free time opening up later today (sat) and tomorrow > (sunday). If anyone needs the time, grab some. I had a particular > problem I am trying to solve- My resist disappeared faster than normal. > It may be a chuck cooling issue on the machine, so beware. > > -Eric > From eap at gloworm.Stanford.EDU Sat Jul 21 19:33:19 2001 From: eap at gloworm.Stanford.EDU (Eric Perozziello) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 19:33:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: STS- resist etching fast Message-ID: <200107220233.TAA28630@gloworm.Stanford.EDU> Thanks for the extra datapoint, Mike. I'm sure it's a machine problem. I ran 5 wafers through litho last week, and etched three at that time. They were fine. I ran the other two today, and the resist was gone before half of the etch was completed. I believe that the He backside seal is leaking, as the He flow is jumping around a bit. Another user observed the pressure during passivation was high. These abnormalities might be pointing to a leaky lip seal. As for the "other problem," everyone should read Nancy's instructions. (If I think of it when I'm out, I'll print them out and leave them by the machine). Her fix seems to work, and it's very quick since the loadlock doesn't require re-pumping. Just shuttle the wafer out and back in, and you're back in business. You just have to pay attention during the loading phase. (This problem might be due to the new ECU that STS installed last weekend, since the ECU provides an interlock signal during the clamping(??)) -Eric From aaronp at micromachine.stanford.edu Sun Jul 22 15:02:48 2001 From: aaronp at micromachine.stanford.edu (Aaron Partridge) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 15:02:48 -0700 Subject: resist consumption In-Reply-To: <200107220056.f6M0u6703561@elaine31.Stanford.EDU> References: <200107220056.f6M0u6703561@elaine31.Stanford.EDU> Message-ID: i agree with eric -- sounds like a helium cooling problem. sometimes this can be caused by even a small fragment of silicon on the seal. take a look with the flashlight. one of the things i'm not cleared to do is open the chamber, so there is not much i can do to help. From hphan at snf.stanford.edu Wed Jul 25 07:44:01 2001 From: hphan at snf.stanford.edu (Henry Phan) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 07:44:01 -0700 Subject: Cancle Reservation Message-ID: <3B5EDB31.ABAECED3@snf.stanford.edu> We won't be able to make it, sorry for the late notice. From booth at snf.stanford.edu Wed Jul 25 08:31:17 2001 From: booth at snf.stanford.edu (Len Booth) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:31:17 -0700 Subject: STSetcher maintenance Message-ID: <3B5EE645.917D9532@snf.stanford.edu> All - I just got a call from STS. They will have a technician here at 10am this morning to replace (give back) our original ECU module. There was free time on the reservation schedule, so I've signed up from 10am until 1:30pm today, so the tech can do the job. Len From latta at snf.stanford.edu Wed Jul 25 15:51:41 2001 From: latta at snf.stanford.edu (Nancy Latta) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: New module installed Message-ID: Folks, STS field service was out today to replace the faulty module. The machine now loads on the first time. You no longer need to follow the previously posted instructions on how to load wafers. As always, please let us know of problems you encounter. Thanks, Nancy From lian at Stanford.EDU Sat Jul 28 00:29:04 2001 From: lian at Stanford.EDU (Lian Zhang) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 00:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: stsetch shut down Message-ID: <200107280729.f6S7T4011178@saga10.Stanford.EDU> Sorry I have to shut it down--there're broken pieces on the chuck that will cause He leakage... From sjlee at snf.stanford.edu Mon Jul 30 15:21:06 2001 From: sjlee at snf.stanford.edu (John Lee) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:21:06 -0700 Subject: stsetch reservations Message-ID: Hi, I *might* be able to release a fair portion of my enviable 2:30-5:30 am reservation, depending on how well things go with some other processing runs. Won't know until later tonight, so please contact me directly by email if interested (or keep a close watch on Coral). -John From sjlee at snf.stanford.edu Mon Jul 30 21:08:57 2001 From: sjlee at snf.stanford.edu (John Lee) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:08:57 -0700 Subject: stsetch availability Message-ID: <3B662F59.5C3C906E@snf.stanford.edu> Hi, After today's quick recovery (thanks!), some of us on tonight's queue have been having pretty good luck. As a pleasant surprise, we've been completing runs quickly and have therefore been able to bump up the reservation schedule a little. So if anyone feels like coming in at 2AM ('til 5:30) it looks like all prior users for the evening/morning will be done by then. Coral has been updated accordingly. Cheers, -John From vossough at snf.stanford.edu Tue Jul 31 18:27:31 2001 From: vossough at snf.stanford.edu (Kris Vossough) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 18:27:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: STS help In-Reply-To: <3B662F59.5C3C906E@snf.stanford.edu> Message-ID: My run was aborted, the error reads; "....pressure failure". If any of the superusers are around and can solve the problem, I would greatly appreciate it! Otherwise, I will shut down the RIE. Thanks, Kris From vossough at snf.stanford.edu Tue Jul 31 22:00:19 2001 From: vossough at snf.stanford.edu (Kris Vossough) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 22:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: STS available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: My etch run is finished. A simple unload-load sequence seems to have resolved the earlier problem. --KV