From ahazeghi at stanford.edu  Tue Aug 24 01:05:22 2010
From: ahazeghi at stanford.edu (Arash Hazeghi)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: PROBLEM WITH THERMCO 1
Message-ID: <793851093.245184.1282637122052.JavaMail.root@zm03.stanford.edu>

Dear Thermco useres, 
I ran 9 wafers in tube 1 WET1000 35min, I had run this recipe 8 times in nthe past year and the thickness is always 3000A, when I ran the same recipie today I got 2000A, has anyone changed any parameter in the recepie or ran any unsual recipe on thermco 1 recently? 

Thanks, 
Arash 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/thermco1/attachments/20100824/e344ca17/attachment.html>

From ahazeghi at stanford.edu  Tue Aug 24 01:13:08 2010
From: ahazeghi at stanford.edu (Arash Hazeghi)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: PROBLEM WITH THERMCO 1
In-Reply-To: <23527_1282637131_4C737D4B_23527_79_4_793851093.245184.1282637122052.JavaMail.root@zm03.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <1497154957.245266.1282637588900.JavaMail.root@zm03.stanford.edu>

I should mention that uniformity was also horrible @ 2%, tyoically it is 0.1%...please advise what has happened to the furnace. 





From: "Arash Hazeghi" <ahazeghi at stanford.edu> 
To: thermco1 at snf.stanford.edu 
Cc: "maurice stevens" <maurice at stanford.edu> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1:05:22 AM 
Subject: PROBLEM WITH THERMCO 1 


Dear Thermco useres, 
I ran 9 wafers in tube 1 WET1000 35min, I had run this recipe 8 times in nthe past year and the thickness is always 3000A, when I ran the same recipie today I got 2000A, has anyone changed any parameter in the recepie or ran any unsual recipe on thermco 1 recently? 

Thanks, 
Arash 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/thermco1/attachments/20100824/4573e1fc/attachment.html>