From kupnik at stanford.edu  Tue May  9 17:19:00 2006
From: kupnik at stanford.edu (Mario Kupnik)
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:19:00 -0800
Subject: long oxidation run on thermco 2
Message-ID: <00b301c673c7$56093d10$6601a8c0@NBKUP>

Hi all,

We plan to do a long oxidation run on thermco2 over the weekend from Friday
May 19 at 5pm
to Monday May 22 at 10 am.

Sorry for the inconvinience this may cause for you.

Best Regards,
Mario





From kupnik at stanford.edu  Mon May 22 00:49:30 2006
From: kupnik at stanford.edu (Mario Kupnik)
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 23:49:30 -0800
Subject: long oxidation run finished
Message-ID: <002401c67d74$428441c0$6601a8c0@NBKUP>

thermco2 is free

Mario




From kupnik at stanford.edu  Tue May 23 19:53:33 2006
From: kupnik at stanford.edu (Mario Kupnik)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:53:33 -0800
Subject: long oxidation run
Message-ID: <006e01c67edd$3f5e1380$1a5740ab@NBKUP>

Hi,
I plan to do a long oxidation run on thermco2 starting
on Sunday May28 at 5pm until Wednesday May31 until 10 am.

Please let me know if that interferes with you. 

Thanks!

Mario




From colbybellew at yahoo.com  Tue May 23 21:14:22 2006
From: colbybellew at yahoo.com (Colby Bellew)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: long oxidation run
In-Reply-To: <006e01c67edd$3f5e1380$1a5740ab@NBKUP>
Message-ID: <20060524041422.74036.qmail@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Tying up a furnace for 65 hours seems a little excessive to me.  Can you please explain what type of run you are doing?  What is the ambient?  What is the temperature?  What are you trying to accomplish?  There may be alternatives that should be considered.

Colby

Mario Kupnik <kupnik at stanford.edu> wrote: Hi,
I plan to do a long oxidation run on thermco2 starting
on Sunday May28 at 5pm until Wednesday May31 until 10 am.

Please let me know if that interferes with you. 

Thanks!

Mario



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/thermco2/attachments/20060523/9494a1ab/attachment.html>

From kupnik at stanford.edu  Tue May 23 22:37:03 2006
From: kupnik at stanford.edu (Mario Kupnik)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:37:03 -0800
Subject: long oxidation run
In-Reply-To: <20060524041422.74036.qmail@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <008201c67ef4$1697b980$1a5740ab@NBKUP>

Colby,
 
Yes, I know and that is the reason I wrote the email to all qualified users
of thermco2. If
thermco1 is not free and someone needs the tube I will postpone or do it
over the weekend.
I see the email as a question to the other users.
 
It is a wet oxidation, at 1100?C. Staff told us not to go to 1150?C to
reduce the oxidation
time because it would stress the boat etc. 
 
 
Mario
 


  _____  

From: Colby Bellew [mailto:colbybellew at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:14 PM
To: Mario Kupnik; thermco2 at snf.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: long oxidation run


Tying up a furnace for 65 hours seems a little excessive to me.  Can you
please explain what type of run you are doing?  What is the ambient?  What
is the temperature?  What are you trying to accomplish?  There may be
alternatives that should be considered.

Colby

Mario Kupnik <kupnik at stanford.edu> wrote: 

Hi,
I plan to do a long oxidation run on thermco2 starting
on Sunday May28 at 5pm until Wednesday May31 until 10 am.

Please let me know if that interferes with you. 

Thanks!

Mario





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://snf.stanford.edu/pipermail/thermco2/attachments/20060523/9fb3671d/attachment.html>