From seymour at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Jan  7 14:41:03 2009
From: seymour at snf.stanford.edu (seymour at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:41:03 -0800
Subject: Shutdown thermcopoly1 SNF 2008-12-30 08:53:57: burnbox
Message-ID: <mailman.391.1356283572.4877.thermcopoly1-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

burnbox is up



From seymour at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Jan  7 14:41:13 2009
From: seymour at snf.stanford.edu (seymour at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:41:13 -0800
Subject: Comment thermcopoly1 SNF 2009-01-07 14:41:13: needs test
Message-ID: <mailman.392.1356283572.4877.thermcopoly1-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>




From maurice at snf.stanford.edu  Thu Jan  8 16:52:40 2009
From: maurice at snf.stanford.edu (maurice at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:52:40 -0800
Subject: Comment thermcopoly1 SNF 2009-01-07 14:41:13: needs test
Message-ID: <mailman.393.1356283572.4877.thermcopoly1-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

ran P580poly  00:45:00
expected 2300Ang
actual  ~2000



From shott at snf.stanford.edu  Tue Jan 20 07:43:53 2009
From: shott at snf.stanford.edu (shott at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:43:53 -0800
Subject: Comment thermcopoly1 SNF 2008-06-06 15:54:49: Higher dep rates
Message-ID: <mailman.394.1356283572.4877.thermcopoly1-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

To the archives ...



From shott at snf.stanford.edu  Tue Jan 20 07:43:58 2009
From: shott at snf.stanford.edu (shott at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:43:58 -0800
Subject: Comment thermcopoly1 SNF 2008-06-11 01:35:24: Dep rate is better
Message-ID: <mailman.395.1356283572.4877.thermcopoly1-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

To the archives ...



From shott at snf.stanford.edu  Tue Jan 20 07:44:03 2009
From: shott at snf.stanford.edu (shott at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:44:03 -0800
Subject: Comment thermcopoly1 SNF 2008-08-27 16:34:24: poly test
Message-ID: <mailman.396.1356283572.4877.thermcopoly1-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

To the archives ...