From latta at snf.stanford.edu Tue Dec 4 13:42:04 2007 From: latta at snf.stanford.edu (latta at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:42:04 -0800 Subject: Problem tylan1 SNF 2007-12-04 13:42:04: mfc alarm Message-ID: N2 too high (after program was completed)- 7.06lpm From latta at snf.stanford.edu Tue Dec 4 17:09:24 2007 From: latta at snf.stanford.edu (latta at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:09:24 -0800 Subject: Comment tylan1 SNF 2007-12-04 17:09:23: Dec Process Quals Message-ID: WET900 00:39:00 50 wafer spread Average all wafers = 883A (expect about 920A) Within-a-wafer = 1.4% (expect less than 5%) Wafer-to-wafer = 1.1% (expect less than 5%) From latta at snf.stanford.edu Tue Dec 4 17:09:39 2007 From: latta at snf.stanford.edu (latta at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:09:39 -0800 Subject: Comment tylan1 SNF 2007-11-02 09:48:19: Nov Process Quals Message-ID: to the archives From tberg at snf.stanford.edu Thu Dec 6 06:04:30 2007 From: tberg at snf.stanford.edu (tberg at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 06:04:30 -0800 Subject: Problem tylan1 SNF 2007-12-04 13:42:04: mfc alarm Message-ID: Adjusted recipe From kghadiri at snf.stanford.edu Sun Dec 9 17:23:32 2007 From: kghadiri at snf.stanford.edu (kghadiri at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:23:32 -0800 Subject: Problem tylan1 SNF 2007-12-09 17:23:31: mfs alarm Message-ID: press "alarm ack" twice but the alarm kept sounding. From rissman at snf.stanford.edu Tue Dec 11 09:14:08 2007 From: rissman at snf.stanford.edu (rissman at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:14:08 -0800 Subject: Comment tylan1 SNF 2007-12-11 09:14:07: mfs alarm Message-ID: Ray cleaned pot with contact cleaner, adjusted zero, did auto zero routine. So far has not been alarming. From mtang at snf.stanford.edu Thu Dec 13 09:10:49 2007 From: mtang at snf.stanford.edu (mtang at snf.stanford.edu) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:10:49 -0800 Subject: Problem tylan1 SNF 2007-12-09 17:23:31: mfs alarm Message-ID: No reported incidents since Ray's repair.