From seymour at snf.stanford.edu  Tue Feb 17 09:04:52 2009
From: seymour at snf.stanford.edu (seymour at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:04:52 -0800
Subject: Comment tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-17 09:04:52: changed pump oil
Message-ID: <mailman.884.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>




From tberg at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Feb 18 06:03:26 2009
From: tberg at snf.stanford.edu (tberg at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:03:26 -0800
Subject: Shutdown tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-18 06:03:25: pull and clean
Message-ID: <mailman.885.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>




From maurice at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Feb 18 15:34:11 2009
From: maurice at snf.stanford.edu (maurice at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:34:11 -0800
Subject: Shutdown tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-18 15:34:11: testing
Message-ID: <mailman.886.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

test after pull and clean



From maurice at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Feb 18 17:24:38 2009
From: maurice at snf.stanford.edu (maurice at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:24:38 -0800
Subject: Shutdown tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-18 06:03:25: pull and clean
Message-ID: <mailman.887.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

Pulled/cleaned/coated/tested



From maurice at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Feb 18 17:26:27 2009
From: maurice at snf.stanford.edu (maurice at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:26:27 -0800
Subject: Shutdown tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-18 15:34:11: testing
Message-ID: <mailman.888.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

ran Polyemit  00:10:00
expect ~1200
actual~1310
A little thick, but ok



From maurice at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Feb 18 17:28:22 2009
From: maurice at snf.stanford.edu (maurice at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:28:22 -0800
Subject: Problem tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-18 17:28:21: Qual test a little thicker than normal
Message-ID: <mailman.889.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

After the pull/clean we ran Polyemit  00:10:00
expect ~1200
actual~1310
A little thick, but ok.
You may want to run a test if your thickness is critical.



From lindaw at snf.stanford.edu  Tue Feb 24 11:01:35 2009
From: lindaw at snf.stanford.edu (lindaw at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:01:35 -0800
Subject: Shutdown tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-24 11:01:35: TCU error message Tube is cold
Message-ID: <mailman.890.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

The front panel displayed TCU error when I started the amor585 program.  The tube is definitely not at 585C.  closed tube and ran polypump program.



From lindaw at snf.stanford.edu  Tue Feb 24 11:03:48 2009
From: lindaw at snf.stanford.edu (lindaw at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:03:48 -0800
Subject: Problem tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-24 11:03:47: TCU error 80
Message-ID: <mailman.891.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

Just to clarify, the panel displayed "TCU error 80".   Help?



From tberg at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Feb 25 06:45:51 2009
From: tberg at snf.stanford.edu (tberg at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:45:51 -0800
Subject: Shutdown tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-24 11:01:35: TCU error message Tube is cold
Message-ID: <mailman.892.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

Reset TCU temp is normal



From tberg at snf.stanford.edu  Wed Feb 25 06:46:02 2009
From: tberg at snf.stanford.edu (tberg at snf.stanford.edu)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:46:02 -0800
Subject: Problem tylanpoly SNF 2009-02-24 11:03:47: TCU error 80
Message-ID: <mailman.893.1356283797.5060.tylanpoly-pcs@snf.stanford.edu>

Reset TCU temp is normal